CVE-2023-27316
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSnapCenter versions 4.8 through 4.9 are susceptible to a vulnerability which may allow an authenticated SnapCenter Server user to become an admin user on a remote system where a SnapCenter plug-in has been installed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authenticated privilege escalation vulnerability in SnapCenter Server versions 4.8-4.9 where an authenticated user with standard SnapCenter privileges can elevate to admin-level access on remote systems where SnapCenter plug-ins are deployed, likely through improper validation of user permissions when executing remote operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.8, <= 4.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SnapCenter Server installation and versionOn the SnapCenter Server host, open the Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion' in PowerShell to list installed applications and their versions. Look for 'NetApp SnapCenter Server' and note the version number.Affected if The installed version is 4.8, 4.8.x, 4.9, or 4.9.x (any version between 4.8 and 4.9 inclusive).
-
Verify remote SnapCenter plug-in deploymentIn the SnapCenter GUI, navigate to the 'Hosts' or 'Plug-ins' section to view connected hosts and installed plug-ins. Alternatively, run 'Get-SmHost' and 'Get-SmPlugin' cmdlets in the SnapCenter PowerShell toolkit to enumerate hosts with plug-ins deployed.Affected if Remote hosts have SnapCenter plug-ins (such as SQL Server plug-in, Exchange plug-in, or file-system plug-in) installed and connected to the SnapCenter Server.
-
Review SnapCenter user role assignmentsIn SnapCenter GUI, go to 'Settings' > 'Users and Authentication' > 'Roles' to view defined roles. Check if any users or groups are assigned to roles other than 'SnapCenter Admin', such as 'Backup Operator' or custom roles with limited privileges. Run 'Get-SmUser' and 'Get-SmUserRole' cmdlets to enumerate users and their assigned roles.Affected if Non-admin users (those without SnapCenter Admin role) exist in the system and have authenticated access to SnapCenter.
-
Confirm remote operation capabilities for standard usersAttempt to trigger a remote operation (such as a backup or restore) on a remote plug-in host using a non-admin SnapCenter user account, or review audit logs in SnapCenter under 'Activity' > 'Audit Logs' for operations executed by standard users on remote plug-in hosts.Affected if Standard (non-admin) SnapCenter users can execute operations on remote plug-in hosts, which would indicate the vulnerable configuration is present.
You are affected if SnapCenter Server version 4.8 through 4.9 is installed, has remote plug-ins deployed to hosts, and contains non-admin users with authenticated access who can execute remote operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a patched SnapCenter version beyond 4.9 and review user role assignments to ensure least-privilege principles are enforced for SnapCenter Server users.
SnapCenter version 4.10 or later
- Identify the current SnapCenter version by navigating to the SnapCenter GUI and checking the 'About' section or running 'Get-SmVersion' via SnapCenter PowerShell CLI
- Contact NetApp support or visit the NetApp Support Site at https://mysupport.netapp.com to obtain the latest SnapCenter version
- Upgrade SnapCenter Server to version 4.10 or later as this version addresses the privilege management vulnerability (CVE-2023-27316)
- After upgrading, verify that all SnapCenter plug-ins are compatible with the new version
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-27316 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-27316 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data