CVE-2025-26512
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSnapCenter versions prior to 6.0.1P1 and 6.1P1 are susceptible to a vulnerability which may allow an authenticated SnapCenter Server user to become an admin user on a remote system where a SnapCenter plug-in has been installed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a privilege escalation vulnerability in SnapCenter Server where an authenticated user can elevate their privileges to become an admin user on remote systems where SnapCenter plug-ins are installed. The vulnerability allows lateral movement from the SnapCenter Server to managed plug-in hosts, bypassing normal authorization controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.0.1= 6.0.1= 6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm SnapCenter installationCheck if SnapCenter Server is installed by looking for the SnapCenter service or installation directory. On Windows, check Services for 'SnapCenter Server' or look in C:\Program Files\NetApp\SnapCenter\Affected if SnapCenter Server is not installed on the system
-
Identify installed SnapCenter versionRun 'Get-PSSnapin -Name NetApp.SnapCenter' to get version info, or check the SnapCenter GUI under the 'About' menu, or look in the installation directory for version.txtAffected if Version cannot be determined or is not visible
-
Compare version against affected rangesCompare your installed SnapCenter version to the affected ranges: < 6.0.1, = 6.0.1, or = 6.1. If running 6.0.1, verify if patch 6.0.1P1 or later is applied by checking the installed build numberAffected if Installed version is 6.0.1 (without P1 or later patch), 6.1, or any version below 6.0.1
-
Check for remote plug-in installationsIn SnapCenter GUI, navigate to 'Hosts' or 'Plug-ins' section to see which remote hosts have SnapCenter plug-ins installed and configured for communication with the SnapCenter ServerAffected if Remote hosts have SnapCenter plug-ins installed and are managed by this SnapCenter Server
-
Verify plug-in communication configurationIn SnapCenter, go to Settings > Global Settings > Plug-in Settings to review how plug-ins communicate with the server and what authentication is in useAffected if Plug-ins are configured to communicate with the SnapCenter Server using default or unvalidated credentials
You are affected if SnapCenter Server version is 6.0.1, 6.1, or any version below 6.0.1, and you have remote hosts with SnapCenter plug-ins installed and managed by this server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.0.1
Upgrade SnapCenter to version 6.0.1P1 or 6.1P1 or later. Additionally, review user access logs on affected SnapCenter Server and remote plug-in systems for signs of unauthorized privilege escalation.
6.0.1P1 or 6.1P1 (or later stable releases in respective branches)
- Identify current SnapCenter version from the SnapCenter Dashboard or using Get-SmVersion cmdlet
- If version is < 6.0.1, upgrade to 6.0.1P1 or later stable release
- If version is exactly 6.0.1, upgrade to 6.0.1P1 or later stable release
- If version is exactly 6.1, upgrade to 6.1P1 or later stable release
- Download the appropriate patch from the NetApp support site (support.netapp.com) using valid support credentials
- Review NetApp SnapCenter upgrade documentation before proceeding
- Backup the SnapCenter repository and configuration before upgrade
- Execute upgrade during a planned maintenance window
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-26512 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-26512 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data