CVE-2023-27997
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.11 and below, version 6.4.12 and below, version 6.0.16 and below and FortiProxy version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.9 and below, version 2.0.12 and below, version 1.2 all versions, version 1.1 all versions SSL-VPN may allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in FortiOS and FortiProxy SSL-VPN allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted requests. The vulnerability stems from improper bounds checking in the SSL-VPN component, enabling an attacker to overflow heap memory and gain code execution privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.1.0, <= 1.1.6>= 1.2.0, <= 1.2.13>= 2.0.0, <= 2.0.12>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.9>= 7.2.0, <= 7.2.3>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.16>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.13>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.12>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.11>= 7.2.0, <= 7.2.4>= 6.0.12, <= 6.0.16>= 6.2.9, <= 6.2.13= 6.0.10= 6.2.4= 6.2.6= 6.2.7= 6.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product and firmware versionRun 'get system status' via CLI or check the FortiOS/FortiProxy web UI dashboard for firmware versionAffected if The version matches any of the following ranges: FortiOS 6.0.0-6.0.16, 6.2.0-6.2.13, 6.4.0-6.4.12, 7.0.0-7.0.11, 7.2.0-7.2.4 (including specific versions 6.0.10, 6.2.4, 6.2.6, 6.2.7, 6.4.2); FortiProxy 1.1.0-1.1.6, 1.2.0-1.2.13, 2.0.0-2.0.12, 7.0.0-7.0.9, 7.2.0-7.2.3
-
Confirm SSL-VPN is enabledRun 'get vpn ssl settings' via CLI or check SSL-VPN configuration in web UI under VPN > SSL-VPN SettingsAffected if SSL-VPN is enabled and listening on the external interface (ssl.vpn.ip or ssl.dtp.tcp port is configured)
-
Check SSL-VPN access policy restrictionsRun 'get firewall policy' and filter for 'ssl.root' as source interface, or check VPN > SSL-VPN > SSL-VPN Policies in web UIAffected if There is an SSL-VPN policy allowing access from 'all' or untrusted IP ranges (0.0.0.0/0) without IP restriction
You are affected if your FortiOS or FortiProxy version falls within the affected ranges AND SSL-VPN is enabled and accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade FortiOS to version 7.2.5+, 7.0.12+, 6.4.13+, or 6.0.17+ and FortiProxy to version 7.2.4+, 7.0.10+, or 2.0.13+ based on the affected branch. If immediate patching is not possible, disable SSL-VPN or restrict access to trusted IP ranges as a temporary workaround.
FortiOS: 6.0.17+, 6.4.13+, 7.0.12+, 7.2.5+ | FortiProxy: 2.0.13+, 7.0.10+, 7.2.4+
- 1. Identify the exact FortiOS or FortiProxy version currently installed by running 'get system status' or 'fnsysctl get system status' via CLI
- 2. Based on your current version, upgrade to the fixed version: For FortiOS 6.0.x, upgrade to 6.0.17 or later; For FortiOS 6.4.x, upgrade to 6.4.13 or later; For FortiOS 7.0.x, upgrade to 7.0.12 or later; For FortiOS 7.2.x, upgrade to 7.2.5 or later; For FortiProxy 1.1.x and 1.2.x, upgrade to 2.0.13 or later; For FortiProxy 7.0.x, upgrade to 7.0.10 or later; For FortiProxy 7.2.x, upgrade to 7.2.4
- 3. Download the firmware upgrade from Fortinet's support portal (support.fortinet.com)
- 4. Upload and install the firmware via the FortiOS/FortiProxy GUI or CLI using 'execute firmware upgrade' command
- 5. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed with 'get system status' and confirm the vulnerability is resolved
- 6. If immediate upgrade is not possible, disable SSL-VPN (go to VPN > SSL-VPN Settings and disable 'Enable SSL-VPN') as a temporary mitigation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,912.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-27997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-27997 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data