CVE-2024-21762
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.15, 6.0.0 through 6.0.17, FortiProxy versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, 2.0.0 through 2.0.13, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in FortiOS and FortiProxy's SSL-VPN web interface that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or command execution via specially crafted HTTP requests. The memory corruption flaw enables complete system compromise without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.0.0, < 2.0.14>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.15>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.9>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.18>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.16>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.15>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.14>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.7>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and versionRun 'get system status' via FortiOS/ FortiProxy CLI to display firmware version, build number, and product nameAffected if The displayed version falls within any of the affected ranges listed in the CVE for FortiOS or FortiProxy
-
Verify SSL-VPN is enabledRun 'get vpn ssl settings' to check if SSL-VPN is currently enabled on the deviceAffected if SSL-VPN status shows as enabled (sslVPN is 'enable' or 'enableful')
-
Check SSL-VPN listen interface exposureRun 'get vpn ssl settings' and review the 'listen-on' or 'bind' interface configuration to identify which interfaces accept SSL-VPN connectionsAffected if SSL-VPN is bound to an interface reachable from untrusted networks such as WAN or port1 with default access
-
Confirm web interface accessibilityRun 'get system interface' and review management access settings, or check 'get system admin' for web UI configurationAffected if HTTP/HTTPS administrative access is enabled on interfaces exposed to untrusted networks
You are affected if your FortiOS or FortiProxy version falls within any of the listed affected version ranges AND either SSL-VPN or the web management interface is accessible from network segments you do not fully trust.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.0.146.0.186.2.16
Upgrade to Fortinet's patched versions (FortiOS 7.4.3+, 7.2.7+, 7.0.14+, 6.4.15+, 6.2.16+, 6.0.18+; FortiProxy 7.4.3+, 7.2.9+, 7.0.15+, 2.0.14+, 1.2.14+, 1.1.7+, 1.0.8+) or disable SSL-VPN functionality if patching is not immediately possible.
FortiOS: upgrade to 6.0.18, 6.2.16, 6.4.15, 7.0.14, 7.2.7, or 7.4.3 (or later). FortiProxy: upgrade to 2.0.14, 7.0.15, 7.2.9, or 7.4.3 (or later). Choose the nearest version in your current major branch.
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiOS or FortiProxy version by running: get system status (for FortiOS) or get system info (for FortiProxy)
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current major version (6.0.x, 6.2.x, 6.4.x, 7.0.x, 7.2.x, or 7.4.x for FortiOS; 1.x, 2.0.x, 7.0.x, 7.2.x, or 7.4.x for FortiProxy)
- 3. Download the corresponding fixed firmware from Fortinet's support portal: https://support.fortinet.com/
- 4. Upload the firmware to the Fortinet device via Web UI (System > Firmware) or CLI: execute restore config or execute upgrade firmware
- 5. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the system status and confirming the new version number
- 6. After upgrade, validate that critical services are functioning normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21762 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21762 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data