CVE-2023-28204
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, iOS 15.7.6 and iPadOS 15.7.6, Safari 16.5, iOS 16.5 and iPadOS 16.5. Processing web content may disclose sensitive information. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCVE-2023-28204 is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in WebKit (the browser engine used by Safari and UIKit-based apps) that allows processing of malicious web content to read memory beyond allocated buffers, potentially exposing sensitive information. This vulnerability was being actively exploited in the wild as a zero-day before Apple released the corresponding patches.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.5< 15.7.6>= 16.0, < 16.5< 15.7.6>= 16.0, < 16.5>= 13.0, < 13.4< 16.5< 9.5< 2.42.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Safari version on macOSOpen Safari, click Safari in the menu bar, then select About Safari to view the version numberAffected if Version is below 16.5
-
Check iOS version on iPhoneOpen Settings app, go to General > About to view the iOS versionAffected if Version is below 15.7.6, or between 16.0 and 16.4 (any version < 16.5 but >= 16.0)
-
Check iPadOS version on iPadOpen Settings app, go to General > About to view the iPadOS versionAffected if Version is below 15.7.6, or between 16.0 and 16.4 (any version < 16.5 but >= 16.0)
-
Check macOS versionClick Apple menu > About This Mac to view the macOS versionAffected if Version is 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, or 13.3 (any version >= 13.0 but < 13.4)
-
Check tvOS version on Apple TVGo to Settings > General > About > Version to view the tvOS versionAffected if Version is below 16.5
-
Check watchOS version on Apple WatchOpen Watch app on iPhone, go to General > About to view watchOS versionAffected if Version is below 9.5
User is affected if any Apple device or Safari browser has a version that falls within the affected ranges (Safari < 16.5, iOS/iPadOS < 15.7.6 or >= 16.0 but < 16.5, macOS >= 13.0 but < 13.4, tvOS < 16.5, watchOS < 9.5).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.42.39.513.4
Apply the available security updates (iOS 16.5/iPadOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, Safari 16.5) to all affected devices. Prioritize externally-facing devices and those handling sensitive data given the confirmed active exploitation.
Safari 16.5; iOS 15.7.6, 16.5; iPadOS 15.7.6, 16.5; macOS 13.4 (Ventura); tvOS 16.5; watchOS 9.5; WebKitGTK+ 2.42.3
- Check current version: On iOS/iPadOS go to Settings > General > About; on macOS go to Apple menu > About This Mac; on Safari go to Safari > About Safari
- Backup important data before updating (optional but recommended)
- Update iOS/iPadOS: Go to Settings > General > Software Update and install the available update
- Update macOS: Go to System Settings > General > Software Update (or System Preferences > Software Update on older macOS)
- Update Safari: Safari updates are included with macOS updates; update macOS to 13.4 or later
- Update tvOS: Go to Settings > General > About > Software Update
- Update watchOS: On iPhone, open Watch app > My Watch > General > Software Update
- For WebKitGTK+ users: Update the package via system package manager (e.g., apt-get update && apt-get upgrade webkit2gtk)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-28204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-28204 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data