Xgs2220 30 FirmwareOperating system · Zyxel

CVE-2023-28768

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-08-14
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper frame handling in the Zyxel XGS2220-30 firmware version V4.80(ABXN.1), XMG1930-30 firmware version V4.80(ACAR.1), and XS1930-10 firmware version V4.80(ABQE.1) could allow an unauthenticated LAN-based attacker to cause denial-of-service (DoS) conditions by sending crafted frames to an affected switch.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Xgs2220 30 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.80\(abxn.1\)
Xgs2220 30f FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.80\(abye.1\)
Xgs2220 30hp FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.80\(abxo.1\)
Xgs2220 54 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.80\(abxp.1\)
Xgs2220 54fp FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.80\(acce.1\)
Xgs2220 54hp FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.80\(abxq.1\)
Xmg1930 30 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.80\(acar.1\)
Xmg1930 30hp FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.80\(acas.1\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch www.zyxel.com →
Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Contact Zyxel for the patched firmware version (refer to security advisory for fixed releases)

  1. Contact Zyxel technical support or visit the official security advisory to obtain the patched firmware version for your specific switch model
  2. Download the firmware update from Zyxel's official support portal (support.zyxel.com)
  3. Review the firmware upgrade instructions in the Zyxel product documentation
  4. Upload and apply the new firmware through the switch's web interface or CLI management interface
  5. After upgrade, verify the switch is functioning normally and the firmware version has been updated
Caveat Standard firmware upgrade risks apply - ensure to backup configuration before upgrading; switches may require reboot causing brief downtime

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can apply and verify the patch for your build — typical engagement from $1,600. Get the patch applied

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-28768 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-28768 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data