CVE-2023-29150
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedmySCADA myPRO versions 8.26.0 and prior has parameters which an authenticated user could exploit to inject arbitrary operating system commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an OS command injection vulnerability in mySCADA myPRO versions 8.26.0 and prior. An authenticated user can inject arbitrary operating system commands through certain parameters, potentially allowing complete system compromise with the privileges of the web application user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.26.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if mySCADA myPRO is installedCheck for the presence of myPRO installation directories (commonly in C:\Program Files\mySCADA or /opt/myscada on Linux) or look for the myPRO service/process running on the systemAffected if mySCADA myPRO software is found running on the system
-
Determine the installed versionCheck the application version through the web interface login page, or inspect version information in the installation directory (typically in a version.txt, about file, or within the myPRO executable properties)Affected if The installed version is 8.26.0 or any prior version (anything <= 8.26.0)
-
Verify web interface accessibilityCheck if the myPRO web interface ports (default 80, 443, or 8080) are listening and accessible on network interfacesAffected if The myPRO web interface is exposed and reachable over the network
-
Check for authenticated user accessReview user accounts configured in myPRO (via the admin panel or user configuration files) to determine if low-privilege or untrusted users have accessAffected if There are user accounts other than strict administrators, or if the authentication mechanism can be bypassed
-
Look for signs of command injectionInspect web server logs (in myPRO/logs directory) for suspicious patterns such as shell metacharacters (;, |, &, $(), ``) in parameter values, or unusual processes spawned by the myPRO service userAffected if Log entries show unexpected command syntax in HTTP requests or unexpected child processes under the myPRO service account
You are affected if mySCADA myPRO version 8.26.0 or earlier is installed and its web interface is accessible to untrusted or low-privilege users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate mySCADA myPRO to a version beyond 8.26.0 that contains the security patch. If immediate patching is not possible, implement strict access controls and network segmentation to limit exposure to trusted users only.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29150 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29150 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data