CVE-2023-29198
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedElectron is a framework which lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Electron apps using `contextIsolation` and `contextBridge` are affected. This is a context isolation bypass, meaning that code running in the main world context in the renderer can reach into the isolated Electron context and perform privileged actions. This issue is only exploitable if an API exposed to the main world via `contextBridge` can return an object or array that contains a javascript object which cannot be serialized, for instance, a canvas rendering context. This would normally result in an exception being thrown `Error: object could not be cloned`. The app side workaround is to ensure that such a case is not possible. Ensure all values returned from a function exposed over the context bridge are supported. This issue has been fixed in versions `25.0.0-alpha.2`, `24.0.1`, `23.2.3`, and `22.3.6`.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceElectron contains a context isolation bypass vulnerability where renderer code can access the isolated context when an API exposed via contextBridge returns non-serializable objects like canvas rendering contexts. Normally such objects throw a cloning error, but the vulnerability allows bypassing this protection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 22.3.6>= 23.0.0, < 23.2.3= 24.0.0= 25.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Electron versionRun 'npm list electron' or check your package.json for the electron dependency versionAffected if The version is less than 22.3.6, between 23.0.0 and 23.2.2, equal to 24.0.0, or equal to 25.0.0
-
Verify context isolation is enabledCheck your webPreferences in BrowserWindow or webContents creation: ensure 'contextIsolation: true' is setAffected if contextIsolation is true AND the Electron version is in the affected range, then the vulnerability applies
-
Identify contextBridge usageSearch your preload scripts for contextBridge.exposeInMainWorld calls. Review each exposed API to determine if it returns non-serializable objects such as canvas rendering contexts, DOM nodes, or functionsAffected if Any exposed API returns canvas contexts or other non-cloneable objects, combined with an affected Electron version, indicates the bypass is possible
You are affected if your Electron version is in the affected range AND you use contextBridge with contextIsolation enabled and expose APIs that return non-serializable objects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.3.623.2.3
Upgrade Electron to version 25.0.0-alpha.2, 24.0.1, 23.2.3, or 22.3.6 or later. Additionally audit all contextBridge API implementations to ensure they never return non-serializable objects.
Electron 22.3.6 (for 22.x users), 23.2.3 (for 23.x users), 24.0.1 (for 24.x users), or latest stable 25.x/26.x
- Identify the current Electron version in use by checking package.json or node_modules/electron/package.json
- Determine which affected version branch you are on (22.x, 23.x, 24.x, or 25.x)
- Update the Electron version in package.json to a fixed release: 22.3.6, 23.2.3, 24.0.1, or latest stable 25.x/26.x
- Run npm install or yarn install to update the dependency
- Rebuild any native dependencies if necessary (e.g., using electron-rebuild)
- Test the application thoroughly, especially any code using contextBridge and contextIsolation
- Verify the fix resolves the issue and that contextIsolation remains enabled
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29198 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29198 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data