CVE-2023-3111
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA use after free vulnerability was found in prepare_to_relocate in fs/btrfs/relocation.c in btrfs in the Linux Kernel. This possible flaw can be triggered by calling btrfs_ioctl_balance() before calling btrfs_ioctl_defrag().
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUse after free vulnerability in the btrfs filesystem's prepare_to_relocate function in fs/btrfs/relocation.c. The flaw is triggered by calling btrfs_ioctl_balance() before calling btrfs_ioctl_defrag(), causing memory corruption through freed memory access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.31, < 4.14.318>= 4.15, < 4.19.286>= 4.20, < 5.4.247>= 5.5, < 5.10.184>= 5.11, < 5.15.63>= 5.16, < 5.19.4= 10.0= 11.0all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if btrfs filesystem is in useRun 'mount | grep btrfs' to list mounted btrfs filesystems, or check /proc/filesystems for btrfs support with 'cat /proc/filesystems | grep btrfs'Affected if btrfs filesystem is mounted or the btrfs kernel module is loaded
-
Check Linux kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to get the running kernel version, then compare against the affected ranges: < 4.14.318, >= 4.15 and < 4.19.286, >= 4.20 and < 5.4.247, >= 5.5 and < 5.10.184, >= 5.11 and < 5.15.63, >= 5.16 and < 5.19.4Affected if the kernel version falls within any of the affected version ranges
-
Check for the vulnerable ioctl sequence in system usageReview any scripts or applications that call btrfs_ioctl_balance() followed by btrfs_ioctl_defrag() on btrfs filesystems; use 'auditctl -w /dev/btrfs-control -p w' to monitor btrfs ioctl calls if audit is availableAffected if applications or scripts are known to call btrfs_ioctl_balance() before btrfs_ioctl_defrag() on btrfs filesystems
-
Verify Debian version for affected systemsFor Debian systems, run 'cat /etc/debian_version' - versions 10.0 and 11.0 are affected if running a vulnerable kernelAffected if running Debian 10.0 or 11.0 with a kernel from the affected version ranges
You are affected if you are running a Linux kernel within the listed version ranges AND using a btrfs filesystem, with the added risk if your workloads invoke the btrfs_ioctl_balance() before btrfs_ioctl_defrag() sequence.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.14.3184.19.2865.4.247
Apply Linux kernel updates that include the fix for CVE-2023-3111; until patched, avoid calling btrfs_ioctl_balance() before btrfs_ioctl_defrag() on btrfs filesystems.
Linux Kernel 4.14.318+, 4.19.286+, 5.4.247+, or 5.10.184+ (or latest stable kernel)
- Identify the current running kernel version with 'uname -r'
- For Linux systems: Upgrade the kernel to version 4.14.318 or later (for 4.14.x kernels), 4.19.286 or later (for 4.19.x kernels), 5.4.247 or later (for 5.4.x kernels), or 5.10.184 or later (for 5.10.x kernels)
- On Debian systems: Run 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade' to install the latest kernel security updates, or specifically 'apt-get install linux-image-$(uname -r)'
- After kernel upgrade, reboot the system to load the fixed kernel
- For H-series firmware devices (H300s, H410c, H410s, H500s, H700s): Contact the device vendor for available firmware updates that address this CVE
- Verify the fix by confirming the kernel version is at or above the fixed release: 'uname -r'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3111 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3111 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data