CVE-2023-31155
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in the Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Real-Time Automation Controller (SEL RTAC) Web Interface could allow a remote authenticated attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script code. See SEL Service Bulletin dated 2022-11-15 for more details.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the SEL RTAC web interface where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being rendered in web pages. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the context of other users' browsers when they access the affected web pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r148-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r134-v0, < r150-v2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SEL RTAC product modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label/documentation to determine the exact model number (e.g., SEL 2241, SEL 3350, SEL 3505, SEL 3530, SEL 3532, or SEL 3555)Affected if The model is one of the affected products listed in the CVE (2241, 3350, 3505, 3505 3, 3530, 3530 4, 3532, or 3555)
-
Determine the installed firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to the firmware/version information page, or use the device CLI command to display firmware version (typically 'show version' or similar)Affected if The displayed firmware version is within the affected range for your model: r132-v0 through r149 (inclusive) for most models, or r148-v0 through r149 for SEL 3355, or r134-v0 through r149 for SEL 3555
-
Confirm the web interface is enabledCheck the device configuration via CLI or web interface to verify if the HTTP/HTTPS web interface service is currently enabled and runningAffected if The web interface is enabled and accessible on the network; the vulnerability exists in the web interface functionality
-
Verify the version falls below the fixed releaseCompare your installed firmware version string against the fixed version r150-v2 - if your version is less than r150-v2, you are in the affected rangeAffected if The installed firmware version is earlier than r150-v2 (for example, r140, r145, r149)
You are affected if you are running any of the listed SEL RTAC product models with firmware versions earlier than r150-v2 and the web interface is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch or firmware update from SEL Service Bulletin (2022-11-15). If immediate patching is not possible, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the RTAC web interface to authorized personnel only, and consider disabling the web interface if not operationally required.
r150-v2 or later
- Obtain firmware version r150-v2 or later from SEL ( Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories ) official sources
- Review the SEL Service Bulletin dated 2022-11-15 for specific upgrade instructions
- Follow SEL standard firmware upgrade procedure for your specific SEL RTAC device model
- Verify the firmware version has been successfully applied after upgrade
- Confirm the web interface is functioning properly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31155 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31155 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data