CVE-2023-31156
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in the Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Real-Time Automation Controller (SEL RTAC) Web Interface could allow a remote authenticated attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script code. See SEL Service Bulletin dated 2022-11-15 for more details.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the SEL RTAC web interface allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious script code that executes in the context of other users' sessions, potentially enabling session hijacking or credential theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r148-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r134-v0, < r150-v2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SEL device modelLocate the physical device label or access the device console to determine the exact model number (e.g., SEL 2241, SEL 3350, SEL 3505, SEL 3530, SEL 3532, or SEL 3555).Affected if The device model matches one of the affected products listed in the CVE.
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface or console and navigate to the firmware/version information section. Compare the displayed firmware version against the affected ranges: r132-v0 to r150-v1 (or r148-v0 to r150-v1 for SEL 3350, or r134-v0 to r150-v1 for SEL 3555).Affected if The firmware version is greater than or equal to the lower bound (r132-v0, r148-v0, or r134-v0 depending on model) AND less than r150-v2.
-
Verify the web interface is enabledConfirm that the SEL RTAC web interface service is running and accessible. Check the device network configuration to ensure HTTP/HTTPS web serving is active.Affected if The web interface is enabled and reachable on the network.
-
Confirm user authentication is configuredCheck if local or remote user accounts are configured on the device for web interface access.Affected if User authentication is enabled, as the CVE requires an authenticated attacker to exploit the XSS vulnerability.
You are affected if your SEL device model is one of the listed products, your firmware version falls within any of the affected ranges (r132-v0 through r150-v1, or the model-specific lower bounds), and the web interface with authentication is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch from SEL Service Bulletin (2022-11-15). If patching is immediately unavailable, implement compensating controls such as restricting web interface access to trusted networks and enforcing strict authentication policies.
r150-v2 or later
- 1. Backup current SEL RTAC device configuration before initiating firmware upgrade
- 2. Obtain the firmware version r150-v2 or later from SEL ( Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories )
- 3. Access the SEL RTAC Web Interface or use SEL's firmware upgrade procedure
- 4. Upload and install the r150-v2 firmware following SEL's documented upgrade process
- 5. After upgrade, verify the firmware version reflects r150-v2 or later
- 6. Test that the web interface functions correctly post-upgrade
- 7. Confirm the XSS vulnerability is resolved by attempting to inject test script payloads that were previously exploitable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31156 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31156 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data