CVE-2023-31442
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Lightbend Akka before 2.8.1, the async-dns resolver (used by Discovery in DNS mode and transitively by Cluster Bootstrap) uses predictable DNS transaction IDs when resolving DNS records, making DNS resolution subject to poisoning by an attacker. If the application performing discovery does not validate (e.g., via TLS) the authenticity of the discovered service, this may result in exfiltration of application data (e.g., persistence events may be published to an unintended Kafka broker). If such validation is performed, then the poisoning constitutes a denial of access to the intended service. This affects Akka 2.5.14 through 2.8.0, and Akka Discovery through 2.8.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe async-dns resolver in Akka uses predictable DNS transaction IDs when resolving DNS records, enabling DNS poisoning attacks. This affects Akka's Service Discovery in DNS mode and Cluster Bootstrap, allowing attackers to redirect service endpoints to malicious servers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.5.14, < 2.8.1< 2.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Akka Actor versionInspect your build configuration file (build.sbt, pom.xml, or build.gradle) for the akka-actor dependency version, or run a dependency tree command like `sbt dependencyTree` or `mvn dependency:tree` to find the akka-actor versionAffected if The version is >= 2.5.14 and < 2.8.1
-
Identify installed Akka Discovery versionInspect your build configuration for the akka-discovery dependency version, or check your dependency tree output for akka-discovery moduleAffected if The version is < 2.8.1 (any version below 2.8.1 is affected if using DNS-based service discovery)
-
Check if DNS-based service discovery is enabledInspect your Akka configuration files (application.conf or reference.conf) for the discovery method setting under `akka.discovery`. Look for `method = dns` or a DNS-based discovery implementationAffected if The discovery method is set to DNS (method = dns) or uses a DNS-based resolver for service discovery
-
Check if Cluster Bootstrap is enabledInspect your Akka cluster configuration for `akka.cluster.bootstrap` settings. Look for cluster bootstrap related configuration blocks that enable DNS-based bootstrappingAffected if Cluster Bootstrap is configured and uses DNS for discovery (the default behavior)
-
Verify DNS resolution is performed by AkkaReview application logs or network traces during service startup to confirm Akka performs its own DNS lookups for service discovery rather than relying on a system resolverAffected if Akka performs DNS queries directly through its async-dns resolver (this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
You are affected if you have Akka Actor >= 2.5.14 or Akka Discovery < 2.8.1 AND you use Akka's built-in DNS-based service discovery or Cluster Bootstrap for service resolution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.8.1
Upgrade Akka to version 2.8.1 or later which implements random DNS transaction IDs. As a defense-in-depth measure, ensure all inter-service communication uses TLS certificate validation.
2.8.1
- Upgrade Akka Actor from any version >= 2.5.14 and < 2.8.1 to version 2.8.1 or later
- If using Akka Discovery (for DNS-based service discovery), upgrade to version 2.8.1 or later
- If using Cluster Bootstrap with DNS-based discovery, ensure the Akka dependencies are all aligned to 2.8.1 or later
- After upgrading, verify that DNS resolution uses cryptographically random transaction IDs rather than predictable ones
- Test that service discovery and cluster formation work correctly with the updated dependencies
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31442 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31442 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data