CVE-2023-32131
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSante DICOM Viewer Pro DCM File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DCM images. Crafted data in a DCM image can trigger a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-15626.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSante DICOM Viewer Pro contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in its DCM image file parsing logic. Crafted data within a malicious DCM file can trigger a write operation past the end of an allocated buffer, allowing an attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process. Exploitation requires user interaction—either opening a malicious DCM file or visiting a webpage containing such a file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.8.12< 11.8.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Santesoft DICOM productCheck installed programs for Santesoft Dicom Editor or Santesoft Dicom Viewer Pro. On Windows, review the Programs and Features list or check Program Files for Santesoft folders.Affected if Either Santesoft Dicom Editor or Santesoft Dicom Viewer Pro is installed
-
Determine installed version of Santesoft Dicom EditorIf the Dicom Editor is installed, locate its executable (typically in Program Files/Santesoft/Dicom Editor) and check file properties for version information, or use the application's About/Help menu to view the version number.Affected if Version is below 7.8.12 (any version shown as 7.8.11 or lower)
-
Determine installed version of Santesoft Dicom Viewer ProIf Dicom Viewer Pro is installed, locate its executable (typically in Program Files/Santesoft/Dicom Viewer Pro) and check file properties for version information, or use the application's About/Help menu to view the version number.Affected if Version is below 11.8.12 (any version shown as 11.8.11 or lower)
-
Assess DCM file processing exposureVerify whether users can open DCM files directly in the application by checking file association settings or testing with a sample DCM file. Review if the application has settings that automatically process or preview DCM files.Affected if DCM files can be opened or previewed directly within the application without additional validation
You are affected if either Santesoft Dicom Editor below version 7.8.12 or Santesoft Dicom Viewer Pro below version 11.8.12 is installed and users can open DCM files in the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.8.1211.8.12
Avoid opening DCM files from untrusted or unknown sources. Apply vendor patches when available and consider deploying additional file scanning or sandboxing for medical imaging workflows.
Dicom Editor 7.8.12 | Dicom Viewer Pro 11.8.12
- Identify which Sante DICOM product is in use: Dicom Editor or Dicom Viewer Pro
- For Dicom Editor: Upgrade to version 7.8.12 or later
- For Dicom Viewer Pro: Upgrade to version 11.8.12 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32131 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32131 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data