CVE-2023-32134
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSante DICOM Viewer Pro DCM File Parsing Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Sante DICOM Viewer Pro. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of DCM images. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-15629.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in Sante DICOM Viewer Pro's DCM image parsing. The software fails to validate the existence of an object before performing operations on it, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a malicious DCM file. User interaction is required (opening a malicious file).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.8.12< 11.8.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Santesoft DICOM productCheck the application name in your installed programs list (Add/Remove Programs on Windows) - look for either 'Santesoft Dicom Editor' or 'Santesoft Dicom Viewer Pro'Affected if Either product is installed, proceed to version check
-
Check installed version of Santesoft Dicom EditorIf Dicom Editor is installed, open it and go to Help > About, or check the program's version property in Windows Programs and Features. Note the full version number (e.g., 7.8.11)Affected if Version is 7.8.11 or lower (less than 7.8.12)
-
Check installed version of Santesoft Dicom Viewer ProIf Dicom Viewer Pro is installed, open it and go to Help > About, or check the program's version property in Windows Programs and Features. Note the full version number (e.g., 11.8.11)Affected if Version is 11.8.11 or lower (less than 11.8.12)
-
Verify DCM file handling capabilityConfirm the software can open .DCM files - check if the application has file open dialogs with DCM filter or displays DCM in supported file type listsAffected if DCM file handling is available, the parsing vulnerability is reachable
You are affected if either Santesoft Dicom Editor version < 7.8.12 or Santesoft Dicom Viewer Pro version < 11.8.12 is installed and the software can open DCM files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.8.1211.8.12
Avoid opening untrusted DCM files from unknown sources. Keep the software updated once a patch is available. Users should not open DCM files from untrusted sources or visit untrusted web pages.
Dicom Editor: 7.8.12 | Dicom Viewer Pro: 11.8.12
- Identify which Sante product is in use: Dicom Editor or Dicom Viewer Pro
- Check the current version of the installed software (typically in Help > About)
- If using Dicom Editor, upgrade to version 7.8.12 or later
- If using Dicom Viewer Pro, upgrade to version 11.8.12 or later
- Obtain the update from the official vendor website or trusted distribution channel
- Restart the application after upgrading
- Verify the installed version matches the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32134 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32134 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data