CVE-2023-32373
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA use-after-free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, iOS 15.7.6 and iPadOS 15.7.6, Safari 16.5, iOS 16.5 and iPadOS 16.5. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUse-after-free vulnerability in WebKit (Apple's browser engine) affecting iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and Safari. Processing maliciously crafted web content can lead to arbitrary code execution. This is a zero-day vulnerability with confirmed active exploitation in the wild.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.5= 6.0= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0< 15.7.6>= 16.0, < 16.5>= 15.0, < 15.7.6>= 16.0, < 16.5< 13.4< 16.5< 9.5< 2.42.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the WebKit-based product in your environmentDetermine whether you are using Safari, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or WebKitGTK+ on any system. For headless servers, check if WebKitGTK+ or WebKit-based browsers are installed.Affected if Any WebKit-based browser or operating system component is in use without knowing its version
-
Check Safari version on macOS or iOSOn macOS: Open Safari > Safari menu > About Safari to view the version number. On iOS/iPadOS: Go to Settings > General > About to view the iOS/iPadOS version (Safari version matches OS version).Affected if Safari version is earlier than 16.5, or iOS/iPadOS version is earlier than 15.7.6, or falls between 16.0 and 16.5 exclusive
-
Check macOS versionClick Apple menu > About This Mac to view the macOS version number.Affected if macOS version is earlier than 13.4
-
Check tvOS or watchOS versionOn Apple TV: Go to Settings > General > About > Version. On Apple Watch: Open the Watch app on iPhone > General > About.Affected if tvOS version is earlier than 16.5, or watchOS version is earlier than 9.5
-
Check WebKitGTK+ version on Linux systemsRun 'webkitgtk-4.1-version' or 'webkit2gtk-4.0-version' in the terminal, or check the installed package version via your package manager (dpkg -l webkit2gtk-4.0 or rpm -q webkit2gtk).Affected if WebKitGTK+ version is earlier than 2.42.3
You are affected if any WebKit-based product in your environment is running a version lower than the fixed version for that product (Safari 16.5, iOS/iPadOS 15.7.6 or 16.5, macOS 13.4, tvOS 16.5, watchOS 9.5, or WebKitGTK+ 2.42.3).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.42.39.513.4
Deploy the available security updates (iOS 15.7.6/16.5, iPadOS 15.7.6/16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, Safari 16.5) to all affected devices as a priority, given confirmed active exploitation.
Upgrade to the fixed version: watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, iOS 15.7.6, iPadOS 15.7.6, Safari 16.5, iOS 16.5, iPadOS 16.5, or WebKitGTK+ 2.42.3
- Identify the affected product from the list (Safari, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or WebKitGTK+)
- Determine the currently installed version of the affected product
- For Apple products: Upgrade to the fixed version as indicated (watchOS 9.5, tvOS 16.5, macOS Ventura 13.4, iOS 15.7.6, iPadOS 15.7.6, Safari 16.5, iOS 16.5, iPadOS 16.5)
- For WebKitGTK+: Upgrade to version 2.42.3 or later
- Restart the device/browser after upgrading to ensure the patch is fully applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32373 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32373 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data