CVE-2023-32711
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.0.5, 8.2.11, and 8.1.14, a Splunk dashboard view lets a low-privileged user exploit a vulnerability in the Bootstrap web framework (CVE-2019-8331) and build a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) payload.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Splunk Enterprise where a low-privileged user can inject malicious scripts through a dashboard view by exploiting an underlying vulnerability (CVE-2019-8331) in the Bootstrap web framework. The payload persists and executes when other users view the affected dashboard.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.14>= 8.2.0, < 8.2.11>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Splunk Enterprise versionRun 'splunk --version' from the Splunk bin directory, or log into the Splunk web interface and navigate to About > Version to view the installed version numberAffected if The installed version falls within 8.1.0 to 8.1.13, 8.2.0 to 8.2.10, or 9.0.0 to 9.0.4
-
Verify low-privileged user dashboard accessIn Splunk Web, confirm that users with low-privileged roles (such as 'user' or 'power') have the ability to create or edit dashboards. Check Roles and Authentication settings under Settings > Users and Authentication > RolesAffected if Low-privileged users can create or modify dashboard views in the environment
-
Inspect existing dashboards for suspicious contentAccess the Splunk Web interface, navigate to Dashboards or Views, and examine dashboard XML definitions for any script tags, javascript: URIs, event handlers (onload, onerror, onclick), or encoded/scrambled content that may indicate injected payloadsAffected if Any dashboard contains suspicious JavaScript code, event handlers, or encoded content that was not authored by administrators
-
Review dashboard creation timestamps and authorsUse the Splunk internal index (_internal) to search for recent dashboard creation events: index=_internal sourcetype=splunkd component=UIFramework | stats count by view, user | sort -count, or check the dashboard XML files in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/shadow/Affected if Dashboards were recently created or modified by low-privileged users that you did not authorize
Your environment is affected if Splunk Enterprise is running a version below 8.1.14, 8.2.11, or 9.0.5 AND low-privileged users have access to create or modify dashboards that contain unexpected script content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.148.2.119.0.5
Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to version 9.0.5, 8.2.11, 8.1.14 or later to address the Bootstrap framework vulnerability and eliminate the stored XSS vector.
Upgrade to Splunk Enterprise 8.1.14, 8.2.11, or 9.0.5 depending on your current branch
- Check current Splunk Enterprise version by navigating to Settings > About > About Splunk Enterprise
- Identify which version branch you are on (8.1.x, 8.2.x, or 9.0.x)
- Review Splunk Upgrade Planning documentation for your version branch
- Create a backup of your Splunk configuration and apps
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Upgrade to the fixed version: 8.1.14 (if on 8.1.x), 8.2.11 (if on 8.2.x), or 9.0.5 (if on 9.0.x)
- Verify the upgrade was successful and all apps are functioning
- Confirm the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing dashboard functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32711 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32711 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data