CVE-2023-32820
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn wlan firmware, there is a possible firmware assertion due to improper input handling. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07932637; Issue ID: ALPS07932637.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability exists in WLAN firmware where improper input handling triggers a firmware assertion, causing the device to crash and resulting in remote denial of service. The exploit requires no user interaction or elevated privileges, making it easily exploitable over the network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.19= 3.1= 3.3= 23.0= 11.0= 12.0= 13.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify kernel versionRun 'uname -r' on Linux/Yocto systems or check kernel version in Android settings under 'About Phone' > 'Kernel version'Affected if Kernel version is exactly 4.19 (e.g., 4.19.x)
-
Identify Yocto versionCheck /etc/lsb-release or run 'cat /etc/os-release' on Yocto-based embedded devicesAffected if Yocto version shows 3.1 or 3.3 (e.g., 'Yocto 3.1' or 'Yocto 3.3' in the OS release info)
-
Identify Android versionGo to Android Settings > About Phone > Android versionAffected if Android version is 11.0, 12.0, or 13.0
-
Check WLAN hardware vendorRun 'lspci | grep -i wireless' for PCIe WiFi cards, or 'lsusb' for USB adapters, or check Android WiFi chip info in Settings > About Phone > SIM Status or hardware infoAffected if WLAN hardware is from Mediatek (MTK, MediaTek) or the device uses Mediatek chipset
-
Check WLAN firmware versionOn Linux/Yocto: run 'iw list' or check '/sys/class/net/wlan0/firmware' or use 'ethtool -i wlan0'. On Android: check WiFi firmware info via 'dmesg | grep wifi' or in kernel logsAffected if WLAN firmware version matches vulnerable Mediatek firmware builds (firmware assertion failures in WLAN subsystem)
-
Verify WLAN interface statusRun 'ip link show wlan0' or 'ifconfig wlan0' to confirm WLAN interface exists and is configuredAffected if WLAN interface is present and active - the vulnerability triggers via network-based input to WLAN firmware
A system is affected if it runs any of the listed kernel/Yocto/Android versions AND uses Mediatek WLAN hardware/firmware, as the improper input handling flaw in the WLAN firmware will trigger firmware assertions leading to denial of service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor firmware patch (ALPS07932637) to affected devices. If patches are unavailable, consider network segmentation to limit WLAN exposure and monitor for unusual firmware assertion failures.
Kernel 5.4+ or later stable releases; specific MediaTek firmware version containing ALPS07932637
- 1. Identify the MediaTek WLAN hardware model in the affected device using `lspci | grep -i network` or `lsusb` for USB wireless adapters
- 2. Obtain the updated firmware patch ALPS07932637 from MediaTek through your device manufacturer or MediaTek's official support channels (corp.mediatek.com)
- 3. If using a Yocto-based distribution, rebuild the firmware image with the updated MediaTek firmware binaries provided in the patch
- 4. For Android devices, apply the firmware update through an OTA (Over-the-Air) update from the device manufacturer or through a security patch level update that incorporates this fix
- 5. For Linux Kernel systems, ensure the kernel is updated to a version that bundles the fixed MediaTek firmware (kernel 5.4+ or later stable kernels with backported fixes)
- 6. After applying the firmware update, verify the WLAN interface loads the updated firmware version using `dmesg | grep -i firmware` or by checking the firmware version through `iw list`
- 7. Test WLAN functionality to confirm the assertion condition is resolved and no denial of service occurs
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32820 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32820 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data