EasyappointmentsApplication

CVE-2023-3286

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A BOLA vulnerability in POST /secretaries allows a low privileged user to create a low privileged user (secretary) in the system. This results in unauthorized data manipulation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the POST /secretaries endpoint allows any authenticated low-privileged user to create new secretary user accounts without proper authorization checks, resulting in unauthorized data manipulation.

MitigationImplement and enforce proper object-level authorization checks on the POST /secretaries endpoint to verify the requester has sufficient privileges to create new user accounts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EasyappointmentsApplication
Affected:< 1.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Easyappointments version
    Locate the version file (typically version.php in the root directory, or check composer.json/package.json for the version field). Compare the version number to the affected range: versions prior to 1.5.0 are vulnerable.
    Affected if The installed version is below 1.5.0
  2. Confirm the /secretaries API endpoint exists
    Locate the API route definitions in the application (typically in routes.php or similar routing configuration files). Verify that a POST /secretaries endpoint is defined for creating secretary user accounts.
    Affected if The POST /secretaries endpoint is defined in the application routing
  3. Check API endpoint authorization logic
    Examine the controller handling the POST /secretaries request. Look for authorization checks that verify the requesting user has sufficient privileges (such as admin-level access) before allowing creation of new secretary accounts.
    Affected if The endpoint lacks proper authorization checks or allows low-privileged authenticated users to create secretary accounts

You are affected if the installed Easyappointments version is below 1.5.0 and the POST /secretaries endpoint permits low-privileged users to create secretary accounts without proper authorization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.5.0 or later
Fixed in 1.5.0
Interim mitigation

Implement and enforce proper object-level authorization checks on the POST /secretaries endpoint to verify the requester has sufficient privileges to create new user accounts.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Easyappointments 1.5.0 or later

  1. Backup your current Easyappointments installation and database
  2. Download Easyappointments version 1.5.0 or later from the official GitHub repository (github.com/alextselegidis/easyappointments)
  3. Extract the new version and replace the application files on your server
  4. Verify file permissions are correctly set after the upgrade
  5. Test that the POST /secretaries endpoint properly enforces authorization (low-privileged users should no longer be able to create secretaries)
  6. Verify the application functions normally for all user roles

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Easyappointments Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3286 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3286 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data