CVE-2023-34034
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUsing "**" as a pattern in Spring Security configuration for WebFlux creates a mismatch in pattern matching between Spring Security and Spring WebFlux, and the potential for a security bypass.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUsing '**' as a URL pattern in Spring Security configuration for WebFlux applications creates a mismatch in pattern matching logic between Spring Security and Spring WebFlux, potentially allowing attackers to bypass security controls and access protected resources they should not reach.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.6.0, < 5.6.12>= 5.7.0, < 5.7.10>= 5.8.0, < 5.8.5>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.5>= 6.1.0, < 6.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Spring Security version in your build fileInspect your pom.xml, build.gradle, or similar build configuration file for the spring-security-version or spring-security-bom versionAffected if The Spring Security version falls within these ranges: >= 5.6.0 and < 5.6.12; >= 5.7.0 and < 5.7.10; >= 5.8.0 and < 5.8.5; >= 6.0.0 and < 6.0.5; or >= 6.1.0 and < 6.1.2
-
Verify WebFlux dependency is presentCheck your build configuration for the spring-boot-starter-webflux or spring-webflux dependencyAffected if Your application includes the WebFlux reactive web framework dependency
-
Identify WebFlux Security configurationLook for a @Bean of type SecurityWebFilterChain in your configuration files, typically in a class annotated with @Configuration and containing WebFlux-specific security setupAffected if Your application defines a custom SecurityWebFilterChain bean for WebFlux security
-
Search for double-wildcard URL patternsSearch your SecurityWebFilterChain configuration for .pathMatchers("**") or similar patterns using double asterisks, or .antMatchers("**") if using the Ant-based configurationAffected if Your WebFlux security configuration contains '**' as a URL pattern in pathMatchers or antMatchers calls that grant access to resources
You are affected if your application uses a vulnerable Spring Security version, includes WebFlux, and has a SecurityWebFilterChain configuration containing '**' wildcard URL patterns.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.6.125.7.105.8.5
Review all Spring Security WebFlux configuration for '**' wildcard patterns and replace with explicit patterns or use Spring Security's WebFilter with proper pattern matching; update to patched Spring Security versions if available.
5.6.12 (if on 5.6.x) | 5.7.10 (if on 5.7.x) | 5.8.5 (if on 5.8.x) | 6.0.5 (if on 6.0.x)
- 1. Identify the current Spring Security version in your project by checking build.gradle, pom.xml, or equivalent dependency file
- 2. Determine which version branch you are currently on (5.6.x, 5.7.x, 5.8.x, or 6.0.x)
- 3. Upgrade Spring Security to the patched version for your branch: 5.6.12, 5.7.10, 5.8.5, or 6.0.5
- 4. Rebuild and test your application to verify the security configuration works correctly
- 5. Review any use of '**' patterns in your Spring Security WebFlux configuration and ensure they are correctly interpreted after the fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-34034 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-34034 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data