Informix JdbcApplication · Ibm

CVE-2023-35895

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-12-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Informix JDBC Driver 4.10 and 4.50 is susceptible to remote code execution attack via JNDI injection when passing an unchecked argument to a certain API. IBM X-Force ID: 259116.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The IBM Informix JDBC Driver versions 4.10 and 4.50 contain a JNDI injection vulnerability that allows remote code execution when untrusted input is passed to a specific API without proper validation. Attackers can manipulate JNDI lookup parameters to inject malicious references, potentially executing arbitrary code on affected systems.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of the IBM Informix JDBC Driver when available, or implement strict input validation on any user-controlled arguments passed to JNDI-related APIs. Network segmentation can reduce the attack surface for externally reachable database connections.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Informix JdbcApplication
Affected:= 4.10= 4.50

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM Informix JDBC Driver version
    Locate the IBM Informix JDBC driver JAR file (typically named like ifxjdbc.jar, ifxjdbc4.jar, or similar) in your application or library directory, then check the manifest file or version metadata. In Java, you can also call Driver.getVersion() or inspect the JAR's manifest for the Implementation-Version attribute.
    Affected if The installed version is 4.10 or 4.50 exactly (the only affected versions listed)
  2. Verify JNDI lookup usage in code
    Search your codebase for JNDI-related API calls such as InitialContext.lookup(), naming.lookup(), or similar JNDI lookup methods. Review code that handles these calls to see if any parameters originate from user input, request parameters, or external data sources.
    Affected if Your application code passes user-controlled or external input directly to JNDI lookup methods without validation
  3. Check for untrusted data in JNDI contexts
    Review any configuration files or application logic that set up JNDI contexts or data sources using the Informix JDBC driver. Identify if attacker-controlled values could reach the lookup or naming resolution chain.
    Affected if User-supplied data flows into JNDI context initialization or lookup operations without sanitization
  4. Review network exposure of database connections
    Examine whether the Informix JDBC driver connects to database servers over network interfaces that are accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules and listener configurations for the Informix server.
    Affected if The database connection is exposed to untrusted networks and the vulnerable driver version is in use

You are affected if your environment uses IBM Informix JDBC Driver version 4.10 or 4.50 AND your application passes unsanitized user input to JNDI lookup APIs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of the IBM Informix JDBC Driver when available, or implement strict input validation on any user-controlled arguments passed to JNDI-related APIs. Network segmentation can reduce the attack surface for externally reachable database connections.

Fix this in Informix Jdbc Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-35895 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-35895 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data