CVE-2023-3640
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA possible unauthorized memory access flaw was found in the Linux kernel's cpu_entry_area mapping of X86 CPU data to memory, where a user may guess the location of exception stacks or other important data. Based on the previous CVE-2023-0597, the 'Randomize per-cpu entry area' feature was implemented in /arch/x86/mm/cpu_entry_area.c, which works through the init_cea_offsets() function when KASLR is enabled. However, despite this feature, there is still a risk of per-cpu entry area leaks. This issue could allow a local user to gain access to some important data with memory in an expected location and potentially escalate their privileges on the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA flaw in the Linux kernel's x86 cpu_entry_area randomization allows local users to predict the location of exception stacks and other critical per-CPU data structures. Despite the CVE-2023-0597 fix adding randomize per-cpu entry area functionality via init_cea_offsets() when KASLR is enabled, the randomization can still be leaked, enabling a local attacker to access sensitive kernel memory locations and potentially escalate privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 8.0= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify system architectureRun 'uname -m' or check /proc/cpuinfo to confirm the system is x86_64 or i686. This vulnerability only affects x86 architectures.Affected if System is not x86 (the vulnerability is specific to x86 cpu_entry_area)
-
Confirm Linux kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to get the running kernel version, then compare against the fixed version for your distribution.Affected if Kernel version is older than the version that includes the CVE-2023-3640 patch (check your distribution's security advisories)
-
Check for cpu_entry_area implementationInspect /arch/x86/mm/cpu_entry_area.c in the kernel source or module. Look for the init_cea_offsets() function and verify if randomization of exception stack locations is present.Affected if The cpu_entry_area mapping does not randomize exception stack locations, allowing address disclosure
-
Verify stack address disclosure possibilityAs a local user, attempt to read kernel memory addresses via /proc/kallsyms, /proc/modules, or other interfaces that may expose per-CPU exception stack addresses. Compare addresses across reboots to check for randomization.Affected if Exception stack addresses are static or predictable across reboots, indicating insufficient randomization
A system is affected if it runs a Linux kernel on x86 architecture where the cpu_entry_area does not properly randomize exception stack locations, allowing local users to determine sensitive per-CPU memory addresses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the upstream kernel patch for CVE-2023-3640 which strengthens the cpu_entry_area randomization logic in arch/x86/mm/cpu_entry_area.c to prevent address leakage.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.x: kernel-4.18.0-xxx or later (check RHSA advisory); RHEL 9.x: kernel-5.14.0-xxx or later (check RHSA advisory). For mainline Linux: kernel 6.4 or later contains the complete fix.
- Update the kernel package to the latest version available in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or 9 repositories using: 'dnf update kernel' or 'yum update kernel'
- Reboot the system to load the updated kernel
- Verify the new kernel version is running using: 'uname -r'
- Confirm the cpu_entry_area randomization is properly enabled by checking kernel config options CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE and relevant cpu_entry_area settings if built as modules
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3640 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3640 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data