CVE-2023-37337
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKofax Power PDF JP2 File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Kofax Power PDF. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JP2 files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-20393.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA missing validation vulnerability in Kofax Power PDF's JP2 (JPEG 2000) file parser allows writing beyond allocated memory boundaries. The parser fails to properly validate user-supplied data within JP2 image files, leading to an out-of-bounds write condition that can be leveraged for arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.0.0.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Power PDF installationCheck for Power PDF in the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall or look for the Power PDF executable in typical installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Kofax\Power PDF or C:\Program Files (x86)\Kofax\Power PDFAffected if Power PDF software is present on the system
-
Determine installed versionRight-click on the Power PDF executable (typically named Power PDF.exe or a similar variant) and select Properties, then inspect the File Version field on the Details tab. Alternatively, check the DisplayVersion value in the Registry under the uninstall key for Kofax Power PDFAffected if The displayed version number is lower than 5.0.0.11 (for example, 5.0.0.10, 4.0.x.x, or earlier versions)
-
Verify JP2 file handling capabilityConfirm that the Power PDF installation includes image import functionality by opening the application and attempting to insert a JP2 file or checking the supported file formats in the application help or file open dialog filtersAffected if The application can open or import JP2 (JPEG 2000) image files
-
Assess user exposure to JP2 filesSearch the system for .jp2 files in common user-accessible locations such as the Downloads folder, Desktop, or network shares, or check email attachments if the email client integrates with the systemAffected if Users routinely receive or open JP2 files from external or untrusted sources
The system is affected if Power PDF is installed with a version lower than 5.0.0.11 and users may open JP2 files from external sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.0.0.11
Do not open untrusted or unsolicited JP2 files, and apply vendor-supplied patches for Kofax Power PDF when available.
Kofax Power PDF 5.0.0.11 or later
- 1. Verify the current installed version of Kofax Power PDF by navigating to Help > About in the application menu
- 2. If the version is below 5.0.0.11, download the latest version of Kofax Power PDF from the official vendor website or your organization's software distribution center
- 3. Close all instances of Power PDF before running the installer
- 4. Run the installer with administrative privileges and follow the on-screen prompts to complete the upgrade
- 5. After installation, verify the new version by checking Help > About to confirm version 5.0.0.11 or later is installed
- 6. As a general precaution, avoid opening JP2 files from untrusted sources until the upgrade is complete
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-37337 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-37337 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data