Domino LeapApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2023-37517

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing "no cache" headers in HCL Leap permits sensitive data to be cached.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

HCL Leap fails to set cache-control headers on responses containing sensitive data, allowing browsers to locally cache this information. Attackers with local access or shared workstations could retrieve cached sensitive data from the browser history or cache files.

MitigationConfigure HCL Leap to include appropriate cache-control headers (no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate) and Pragma: no-cache headers on all responses containing sensitive data to prevent browser caching.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Domino LeapApplication
Affected:>= 1.1, < 1.1.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed HCL Leap version
    Locate the version information in the Domino Leap installation directory, typically in a version file or via the Leap administration interface under System > Information > Version
    Affected if The installed version is 1.1.0 or 1.1.1 (versions >= 1.1.0 and < 1.1.2 are affected)
  2. Confirm Leap deployment is accessible
    Access the HCL Leap web application URL and verify it is operational
    Affected if The application is running and accessible to users
  3. Inspect HTTP response headers for sensitive endpoints
    Use browser developer tools (Network tab) or a command-line tool like curl to capture HTTP response headers from pages that contain or process sensitive user data (e.g., forms with personal information, admin pages)
    Affected if Responses lack cache-control: no-store, cache-control: no-cache, and Pragma: no-cache headers
  4. Examine browser cache for Leap content
    Check the browser cache directory or use browser developer tools to see if Leap pages containing sensitive data are being stored locally
    Affected if Sensitive form data or user information is found in the browser cache

You are affected if the installed Leap version is 1.1.0 or 1.1.1 and the HTTP responses lack cache-control headers, allowing sensitive data to be stored in the browser cache.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.1.2 or later
Fixed in 1.1.2
Interim mitigation

Configure HCL Leap to include appropriate cache-control headers (no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate) and Pragma: no-cache headers on all responses containing sensitive data to prevent browser caching.

Recommended fix High confidence

HCL Domino Leap 1.1.2

  1. Back up the current HCL Domino Leap installation and all application data
  2. Download HCL Domino Leap version 1.1.2 from the official HCL support portal (support.hcl-software.com)
  3. Follow HCL's standard upgrade procedure for Domino Leap, stopping the Domino Leap server before the upgrade
  4. Install HCL Domino Leap 1.1.2 using the HCL installation wizard or command-line tools
  5. Start the Domino Leap server after installation completes
  6. Verify the version shows 1.1.2 in the Domino Leap admin console
  7. Test that applications function correctly after the upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Domino Leap Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-37517 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-37517 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data