CVE-2024-30145
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vectors in HCL Domino Volt and Domino Leap allow client-side script injection in the authoring environment and deployed applications.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HCL Domino Volt and Domino Leap low-code application platforms. The flaw allows injection of malicious client-side scripts through multiple vectors in both the application authoring environment and in deployed applications, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in users' browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.1, < 1.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify HCL Domino Leap installationLocate Domino Leap by checking for its service process, installation directory (typically under IBM/Domino or HCL), or by accessing the Domino Leap administration console at /domino-leap/Affected if HCL Domino Leap software is present in the environment
-
Determine installed Domino Leap versionAccess the Domino Leap administration console and navigate to the About page, or check the version metadata in the installation directory. Alternatively, query the server for version information through the Domino Leap admin interface.Affected if The installed version is 1.1.0 through 1.1.4 (versions >= 1.1 but < 1.1.5)
-
Check if application authoring environment is exposedVerify network accessibility of the Domino Leap application builder interface (typically at /appBuilder/ or similar endpoints). Review reverse proxy or firewall rules controlling access to authoring URLs.Affected if The authoring environment is accessible from untrusted networks without authentication controls
-
Identify deployed applications handling user inputReview the Domino Leap application catalog to enumerate deployed applications. For each application, examine form configurations and data entry points that accept user-supplied content.Affected if Deployed applications contain form fields, rich text editors, or data capture interfaces that accept and display user input without visible output encoding configuration
-
Inspect Content Security Policy configurationCheck the Domino Leap server configuration and deployed application settings for Content-Security-Policy headers. Look for CSP rules in the server's internet site documents or application security settings.Affected if CSP headers are not configured or explicitly allow 'unsafe-inline' or 'unsafe-inline' script sources
A user is affected if HCL Domino Leap version 1.1 through 1.1.4 is installed and exposed environments handle user-supplied data without proper CSP controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.1.5
Implement input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data, configure Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict script execution, and apply vendor-supplied patches when released. Review existing applications for XSS vulnerabilities in the interim.
HCL Domino Leap 1.1.5
- 1. Back up your current Domino Leap installation and application data
- 2. Download HCL Domino Leap version 1.1.5 from the HCL Software support portal (support.hcl-software.com)
- 3. Stop the Domino Leap server services
- 4. Install Domino Leap 1.1.5 following the standard upgrade procedure
- 5. Verify the installation completed successfully
- 6. Test that XSS protections are working in both the authoring environment and deployed applications
- 7. Restart Domino Leap server services
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30145 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30145 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data