Appscan PresenceApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2023-37537

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.1.37 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unquoted service path vulnerability in HCL AppScan Presence, deployed as a Windows service in HCL AppScan on Cloud (ASoC), may allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is an unquoted service path vulnerability in HCL AppScan Presence when deployed as a Windows service in HCL AppScan on Cloud. The lack of quotes around the service's executable path allows a local attacker to place a malicious executable in an intermediate directory in the path, which will be executed with elevated (SYSTEM) privileges when the service starts.

MitigationThe service path in the Windows service configuration must be properly quoted (e.g., 'C:\Program Files\HCL\AppScan\bin\presence.exe' instead of C:\Program Files\HCL\AppScan\bin\presence.exe). This requires modifying the service definition and restarting the affected service.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Appscan PresenceApplication
Affected:<= 2.1.37

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if HCL AppScan Presence service exists
    Open Windows Services (services.msc) or run 'sc query' command and look for a service named 'HCL AppScan Presence' or similar presence-related service
    Affected if The service is present and running on the system
  2. Retrieve the service executable path
    Run 'sc qc <service_name>' to query the service configuration, or use 'wmic service where "name like '%Appscan%'" get pathname,displayname' to retrieve the executable path
    Affected if The service binary path is returned and contains spaces without quotes
  3. Verify if the service path is unquoted
    Examine theBINARY_PATH_NAME field from the service configuration. Check if the path contains spaces (e.g., C:\Program Files\HCL\AppScan\bin\presence.exe) and is NOT enclosed in quotation marks
    Affected if The path contains spaces and is not surrounded by double quotes
  4. Confirm product version is within affected range
    Check the installed version of HCL AppScan Presence (typically via Add/Remove Programs, or by running 'presence.exe -v' if such option exists) and compare against <= 2.1.37
    Affected if The installed version is 2.1.37 or lower
  5. Check for exploitable intermediate directories
    If the path is unquoted, list each directory in the path (e.g., C:\Program Files\HCL\AppScan\bin\) and verify file system permissions allowing write access to intermediate folders
    Affected if A non-quoted path with writable intermediate directories exists, allowing potential privilege escalation

A user is affected if HCL AppScan Presence is installed as a Windows service with an unquoted executable path containing spaces and the version is 2.1.37 or lower.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.1.37
Interim mitigation

The service path in the Windows service configuration must be properly quoted (e.g., 'C:\Program Files\HCL\AppScan\bin\presence.exe' instead of C:\Program Files\HCL\AppScan\bin\presence.exe). This requires modifying the service definition and restarting the affected service.

Fix this in Appscan Presence Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-37537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-37537 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data