MlflowApplication · Lfprojects

CVE-2023-3765

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-07-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
High EPSS Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Absolute Path Traversal in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.5.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

An absolute path traversal vulnerability exists in MLflow versions prior to 2.5.0, allowing attackers to access files outside the intended directory by supplying absolute file paths. This enables unauthorized file system access including reading sensitive files, configuration data, or code from arbitrary locations on the server.

MitigationUpgrade MLflow to version 2.5.0 or later. Implement strict path validation to ensure user-supplied paths are normalized and confined within allowed directories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MlflowApplication
Affected:< 2.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify MLflow version
    Run 'pip show mlflow' or check the installed package version via your package manager. Alternatively, query the MLflow server's API endpoint if running.
    Affected if The installed version is prior to 2.5.0 (e.g., 2.4.x, 2.3.x, etc.)
  2. Confirm MLflow server is exposed
    Determine if the MLflow tracking server or artifact server is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS to external users or untrusted inputs. Check network configuration and firewall rules.
    Affected if The MLflow server is network-accessible to untrusted users or processes without proper authentication or network segmentation.
  3. Check artifact storage backend configuration
    Review MLflow configuration for 'artifact_location' or 'default-artifact-root' settings. Identify what storage backend is used (local filesystem, S3, GCS, Azure Blob, etc.).
    Affected if Artifact storage uses a local filesystem backend and paths are not restricted to a specific directory tree.
  4. Verify path handling in MLflow API endpoints
    Test whether MLflow API endpoints that handle file paths accept absolute path inputs. Look for endpoints related to artifact upload/download or model serving.
    Affected if The API accepts absolute file paths in request parameters and returns file contents from outside the intended artifact directory.

You are affected if MLflow version is below 2.5.0 AND the server is accessible to process untrusted requests that can supply absolute file paths to MLflow artifact or model APIs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.5.0 or later
Fixed in 2.5.0
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade MLflow to version 2.5.0 or later. Implement strict path validation to ensure user-supplied paths are normalized and confined within allowed directories.

Recommended fix High confidence

2.5.0

  1. Identify the current installed version of MLflow using 'pip show mlflow' or 'mlflow --version'
  2. Upgrade MLflow to version 2.5.0 or later using 'pip install --upgrade mlflow>=2.5.0'
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version with 'pip show mlflow'
  4. Restart any MLflow tracking servers or related services that are running to ensure the patched version is loaded
  5. If using a package manager like conda, update accordingly: 'conda install -c conda-forge mlflow>=2.5.0' or 'pip install --upgrade mlflow>=2.5.0' within the conda environment
Caveat Review the MLflow 2.5.0 release notes for any breaking changes or deprecated features before upgrading in production environments

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mlflow Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3765 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3765 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data