MlflowApplication · Lfprojects

CVE-2025-15036

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.9.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A path traversal vulnerability exists in the `extract_archive_to_dir` function within the `mlflow/pyfunc/dbconnect_artifact_cache.py` file of the mlflow/mlflow repository. This vulnerability, present in versions before v3.7.0, arises due to the lack of validation of tar member paths during extraction. An attacker with control over the tar.gz file can exploit this issue to overwrite arbitrary files or gain elevated privileges, potentially escaping the sandbox directory in multi-tenant or shared cluster environments.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A path traversal vulnerability in mlflow's `extract_archive_to_dir` function allows attackers to craft malicious tar.gz archives containing files with relative paths (e.g., ../../../etc/passwd). Without validating extracted member paths, the extraction process writes files outside the intended sandbox directory, enabling arbitrary file overwrite and privilege escalation.

MitigationUpgrade to mlflow v3.7.0 or later, which implements proper validation of tar member paths before extraction. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement path validation to ensure extracted paths remain within the target directory.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MlflowApplication
Affected:< 3.9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed mlflow version
    Run 'pip show mlflow' or 'python -c "import mlflow; print(mlflow.__version__)"' to get the installed version number
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.9.0
  2. Locate the vulnerable module
    Check if the file pyfunc/dbconnect_artifact_cache.py exists in the mlflow installation directory. Use 'python -c "import mlflow.pyfunc.dbconnect_artifact_cache; print(mlflow.pyfunc.dbconnect_artifact_cache.__file__)"' to find its path
    Affected if The file exists and the version is below 3.9.0
  3. Inspect for path validation in extraction code
    Review the extract_archive_to_dir function source code for presence of path traversal checks. Look for validation that rejects entries starting with '/' or containing '..' sequences before extraction proceeds
    Affected if No such validation is found - the code directly extracts archive members without checking for absolute paths or parent directory references

A user is affected if they have mlflow installed with version below 3.9.0 and the extract_archive_to_dir function performs extraction without validating tar member paths.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.9.0 or later
Fixed in 3.9.0
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to mlflow v3.7.0 or later, which implements proper validation of tar member paths before extraction. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement path validation to ensure extracted paths remain within the target directory.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.9.0

  1. 1. Identify the current mlflow version by running `pip show mlflow` or checking your dependency files
  2. 2. Upgrade mlflow to version 3.9.0 or later using `pip install --upgrade mlflow>=3.9.0` or update your dependency file
  3. 3. Verify the upgrade was successful by running `pip show mlflow` and confirming the version number
  4. 4. Test that your mlflow deployment still functions correctly after the upgrade
Caveat Review mlflow 3.9.0 release notes for any deprecation notices or behavioral changes that may affect your workloads

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mlflow Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-15036 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-15036 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data