CVE-2023-38002
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Storage Scale 5.1.0.0 through 5.1.9.2 could allow an authenticated user to steal or manipulate an active session to gain access to the system. IBM X-Force ID: 260208.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Storage Scale versions 5.1.0.0 through 5.1.9.2 contain a session management vulnerability where an authenticated user can steal or manipulate active sessions to gain unauthorized access to the system. This is a session hijacking issue allowing privilege escalation through session token theft or manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1.0.0, < 5.2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Storage Scale versionRun 'mmfsadm -V' or check the installed package version using the system package manager (e.g., 'rpm -q ibm-spectrum-scale'), or inspect the output of 'lsrpms' for the scale package.Affected if Version is 5.1.0.0 through 5.1.9.2 (any version >= 5.1.0.0 but < 5.2.0.0)
-
Confirm session management is in useDetermine if the system has user authentication enabled by checking if LDAP, Kerberos, or local user authentication is configured for IBM Storage Scale. Review /var/mmfs/ssl/ directory and check for session-related configuration files.Affected if Any form of user authentication or session-based login to IBM Storage Scale is configured or in use
-
Inspect session token handlingCheck if the system uses session cookies or tokens for GUI or CLI authentication. Look in configuration files such as /var/mmfs/etc/* or examine cookie settings if the IBM Storage Scale GUI is accessible. Use 'mmdiag --config' to review authentication settings.Affected if Session tokens or cookies are generated without secure attributes (HttpOnly, Secure flags) or session IDs can be observed in logs or configurations
-
Review active session configurationExamine configuration files related to session management, typically found in the IBM Storage Scale installation directory or within /var/mmfs/. Look for any custom session management implementations or third-party session handling configurations.Affected if Session management uses default or weak token generation, or sessions are not invalidated on logout
User is affected if IBM Storage Scale version 5.1.0.0 through 5.1.9.2 is installed and the system uses any form of authenticated sessions for user access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.0.0
Apply IBM Storage Scale version 5.1.9.3 or later which contains the security fix. Review session management implementation and ensure proper session token handling, secure cookie attributes, and session invalidation on logout.
IBM Storage Scale 5.2.0.0 or later
- Verify current IBM Storage Scale version using 'lsscale -V' or 'mmgetstate -a'
- Review IBM Storage Scale 5.2.0.0 release notes for upgrade prerequisites and known issues
- Ensure adequate system backup including GPFS configuration
- Take a snapshot or backup of critical data
- Follow IBM documentation for rolling upgrade or offline upgrade procedure to version 5.2.0.0 or later
- After upgrade, verify the fix by confirming the version is now >= 5.2.0.0
- Test session management functionality to confirm the session fixation vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-38002 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-38002 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data