CVE-2024-31891
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Storage Scale GUI 5.1.9.0 through 5.1.9.6 and 5.2.0.0 through 5.2.1.1 contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability. A malicious actor with command line access to the 'scalemgmt' user can elevate privileges to gain root access to the host operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Storage Scale GUI versions 5.1.9.0-5.1.9.6 and 5.2.0.0-5.2.1.1 contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability where a user with command-line access to the low-privileged 'scalemgmt' account can gain root access to the underlying host operating system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1.9.0, < 5.1.9.7>= 5.2.0.0, < 5.2.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify IBM Storage Scale installationRun the command to display the installed IBM Storage Scale version (for example, 'rpm -q ibm-spectrum-scale-gui' or check the product version via 'lsrpkg' or 'lslpp' depending on your system).Affected if The command fails to return a version or the product is not installed.
-
Compare installed version to affected rangesMatch the installed version against the affected ranges: 5.1.9.0 through 5.1.9.6, or 5.2.0.0 through 5.2.1.1. Versions 5.1.9.7 and above, or 5.2.2.0 and above are fixed.Affected if The installed version falls within 5.1.9.0-5.1.9.6 or 5.2.0.0-5.2.1.1.
-
Confirm scalemgmt user account existsCheck if the 'scalemgmt' user exists on the system (for example, 'id scalemgmt' or look in /etc/passwd).Affected if The scalemgmt user account is present on the system.
-
Check scalemgmt user access methodVerify whether command-line access to the scalemgmt account is possible (check /etc/shadow permissions, SSH configuration, or su/sudo access).Affected if Non-root users can obtain a command-line shell or execute commands as the scalemgmt user.
You are affected if IBM Storage Scale GUI is installed with a version between 5.1.9.0-5.1.9.6 or 5.2.0.0-5.2.1.1 AND the scalemgmt user account exists with command-line access available to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.1.9.75.2.2.0
Apply vendor-provided security patches for IBM Storage Scale when available. Until patched, strictly limit access to the scalemgmt user account and monitor for any unauthorized access attempts.
Upgrade to Storage Scale 5.1.9.7 (minimum) or 5.2.2.0 (minimum) depending on your current branch
- 1. Back up all critical data and configurations according to IBM Storage Scale backup procedures
- 2. Download IBM Storage Scale version 5.1.9.7 (for systems currently on 5.1.9.x) or version 5.2.2.0 (for systems currently on 5.2.x) from IBM Fix Central or your authorized IBM support channel
- 3. Stop all IBM Storage Scale GUI services before applying the upgrade
- 4. Apply the upgrade package using IBM's standard installation/upgrade procedures (smupgrade or equivalent method for your deployment
- 5. After upgrade completion, verify the GUI version reflects the fixed release (5.1.9.7 or 5.2.2.0)
- 6. Confirm the 'scalemgmt' user no longer has privilege escalation capability by reviewing any security configuration changes in the release notes
- 7. Restart Storage Scale services and validate normal operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31891 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31891 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data