CVE-2023-39169
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe affected devices use publicly available default credentials with administrative privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAffected devices ship with publicly available default credentials that provide administrative privileges. An attacker with knowledge of these default credentials can gain full administrative control over the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device and firmware versionAccess the device administrative interface or check the device label/model number to confirm it is an Enbw Senec Storage Box. Note the firmware version if displayed in the system information or status page.Affected if The device is an Enbw Senec Storage Box with any firmware version, as all versions ship with default credentials.
-
Determine if default credentials are still in useAttempt to log in to the administrative interface using the publicly known default credentials for the Enbw Senec Storage Box. If login succeeds without having changed the password, the default credentials are still active.Affected if The default administrative credentials have not been changed from the factory-set values.
-
Check if remote administrative access is enabledLocate the remote access or network administration settings in the device configuration. Look for options such as 'Remote Access', 'Web Access', 'Cloud Access', or similar that enable administration over network or internet connections.Affected if Remote administrative access is enabled, exposing the login interface to network or internet-based attackers who could use the default credentials.
-
Verify credential change historyIf available, check the device audit logs or user management settings to determine when the administrative password was last changed. Look for any indication that the password has never been modified from the default.Affected if No evidence exists of the administrative password having been changed since initial setup.
A user is affected if the Enbw Senec Storage Box still uses the factory default administrative credentials, regardless of firmware version, or if remote administrative access is enabled with those credentials still active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately change all default credentials to strong, unique passwords on affected devices. If possible, disable remote administrative access or limit it to trusted networks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,064.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39169 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39169 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data