Rt Ax55 FirmwareOperating system · Asus

CVE-2023-39240

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
It is identified a format string vulnerability in ASUS RT-AX56U V2’s iperf client function API. This vulnerability is caused by lacking validation for a specific value within its set_iperf3_cli.cgi module. A remote attacker with administrator privilege can exploit this vulnerability to perform remote arbitrary code execution, arbitrary system operation or disrupt service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A format string vulnerability exists in the iperf client function API of ASUS RT-AX56U V2 routers, specifically within the set_iperf3_cli.cgi module. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of a specific input value, allowing a remote attacker with administrator privileges to achieve remote code execution, perform arbitrary system operations, or cause denial of service.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied firmware patch when available. Until then, strictly limit administrative access to trusted users only and consider network segmentation to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rt Ax55 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 3.0.0.4.386_50460
Rt Ax56u V2 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 3.0.0.4.386_50460
Rt Ac86u FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 3.0.0.4_386_51529

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify router model
    Access the router administration interface and navigate to the System Log or Device Info page to confirm the exact model number (RT-AX55, RT-AX56U V2, or RT-AC86U)
    Affected if Model is not one of RT-AX55, RT-AX56U V2, or RT-AC86U - the vulnerability does not apply to other models
  2. Check firmware version
    In the router admin interface, go to Administration > Firmware Upgrade or System > Firmware Version to view the installed firmware build number
    Affected if Firmware version is exactly 3.0.0.4.386_50460 (for RT-AX55 or RT-AX56U V2) or 3.0.0.4_386_51529 (for RT-AC86U) - other versions are not affected by this specific CVE
  3. Verify iperf3 client API is accessible
    Attempt to access the set_iperf3_cli.cgi endpoint on the router (typically at http://router-ip/cgi-bin/set_iperf3_cli.cgi) or check if the iperf3 client function appears in the router's web interface under network tools
    Affected if The iperf3 client feature and its CGI module are present and accessible - the vulnerability only exists when this module is available
  4. Confirm administrator access exists
    Verify current administrative credentials are valid by logging into the router web interface or checking for active administrator sessions
    Affected if Attacker has valid administrator credentials - the vulnerability requires administrator privileges to be exploited

The environment is affected only if the router model is RT-AX55, RT-AX56U V2, or RT-AC86U AND the firmware version exactly matches the vulnerable builds AND the iperf3 client API module is present AND the attacker has administrator credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied firmware patch when available. Until then, strictly limit administrative access to trusted users only and consider network segmentation to reduce attack surface.

Fix this in Rt Ax55 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-39240 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-39240 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data