Wp PipesWordPress extension · Thimpress
CVE-2023-40009
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress WP Pipes plugin <= 1.4.0 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ThimPress WP Pipes WordPress plugin versions 1.4.0 and earlier allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended administrative actions by tricking them into submitting malicious requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Wp PipesWordPress extension
<= 1.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WP Pipes plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'WP Pipes' or 'Thimpress WP Pipes' in the listAffected if Plugin is installed and active
-
Check installed version of WP PipesOn the Plugins page, look at the version number displayed under the plugin name, or check the plugin's main PHP file header for the 'Version' commentAffected if Version is 1.4.0 or lower
-
Inspect plugin forms for nonce fieldsExamine the plugin's PHP files for form handlers that perform administrative actions. Look for presence of wp_nonce_field() or wp_nonce_url() calls in forms that change plugin settings or dataAffected if Forms handling state-changing actions lack nonce verification
-
Inspect AJAX actions for nonce validationCheck plugin AJAX handlers (admin-ajax.php calls) for proper nonce verification using check_ajax_referer() or wp_verify_nonce()Affected if AJAX actions that modify data lack nonce validation
User is affected if WP Pipes version 1.4.0 or lower is installed and active, and the plugin's forms or AJAX actions missing nonce protection are accessible to authenticated users
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate WP Pipes to the latest version when available; as an interim measure, ensure WordPress anti-CSRF nonces are implemented on all state-changing forms and AJAX actions.
Fix this in Wp Pipes
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40009 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40009 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data