Wp PipesWordPress extension · Thimpress
CVE-2025-28982
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in ThimPress WP Pipes allows SQL Injection. This issue affects WP Pipes: from n/a through 1.4.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the WP Pipes WordPress plugin allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through improper neutralization of special elements. The vulnerability affects versions through 1.4.3 and is rated critical due to the potential for complete database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Wp PipesWordPress extension
<= 1.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate WP Pipes plugin installationNavigate to the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) or access the Plugins page in the WordPress admin dashboardAffected if The WP Pipes plugin by Thimpress is installed on the WordPress site
-
Check installed version of WP PipesIn the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins, locate WP Pipes and read the version number displayed beneath the plugin name. Alternatively, open the main plugin file (commonly wp-pipes.php or index.php in the wp-pipes folder) and locate the 'Version:' field in the plugin header commentAffected if The installed version is 1.4.3 or any earlier version (the vulnerability affects all versions through 1.4.3)
-
Confirm plugin is activeCheck if the WP Pipes plugin shows as 'Active' in the WordPress admin plugins list, or verify the plugin is loaded in the active_plugins option in the wp_options database tableAffected if The plugin is currently activated on the WordPress site, as the SQL injection requires the vulnerable code to be executed
If WP Pipes version 1.4.3 or earlier is installed and active, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate WP Pipes to the latest version if available, or implement proper input validation and parameterized queries in the codebase to remediate the SQL injection. Consider temporarily disabling the plugin if no patch is available.
Fix this in Wp Pipes
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-28982 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-28982 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data