CVE-2023-40018
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to version 1.10.10, FreeSWITCH allows remote users to trigger out of bounds write by offering an ICE candidate with unknown component ID. When an SDP is offered with any ICE candidates with an unknown component ID, FreeSWITCH will make an out of bounds write to its arrays. By abusing this vulnerability, an attacker is able to corrupt FreeSWITCH memory leading to an undefined behavior of the system or a crash of it. Version 1.10.10 contains a patch for this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFreeSWITCH prior to 1.10.10 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in its ICE candidate processing. When receiving an SDP offer containing ICE candidates with unknown component IDs, FreeSWITCH writes beyond array bounds, corrupting memory and potentially causing undefined behavior or system crashes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.10.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FreeSWITCH installationRun 'freeswitch -version' or check installed packages with 'dpkg -l | grep freeswitch' or 'rpm -qa | grep freeswitch'Affected if FreeSWITCH is installed and version is below 1.10.10
-
Verify FreeSWITCH daemon versionRun 'fs_cli -x "version"' or check the running process with 'ps aux | grep freeswitch' and review logs for version stringAffected if Running daemon version is below 1.10.10
-
Confirm SIP/SDP handling is enabledCheck if mod_sofia or SIP profile is loaded: 'fs_cli -x "module_list" | grep sofia' or review sip_profiles configuration in /etc/freeswitch/sip_profiles/Affected if SIP/SDP processing (mod_sofia) is enabled and handling external SDP offers
-
Check for exposed SIP serviceReview network configuration for port 5060/5080 listeners: 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "(5060|5080)"' or check sip_interfaces in FreeSWITCH configAffected if SIP ports are listening on external or untrusted network interfaces
You are affected if FreeSWITCH version is below 1.10.10 AND the system processes SDP offers from untrusted sources via enabled SIP/SDP handling.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.10.10
Upgrade FreeSWITCH to version 1.10.10 or later. Until then, restrict SIP/SDP access to trusted sources using network-level filtering to reduce attack surface.
1.10.10
- Identify the current FreeSWITCH version by running 'freeswitch -version' or checking via package manager
- Backup the FreeSWITCH configuration directory (typically /etc/freeswitch or /usr/local/freeswitch/conf)
- Stop the FreeSWITCH service using 'systemctl stop freeswitch' or 'freeswitch -stop'
- Upgrade FreeSWITCH to version 1.10.10 or later using the appropriate package manager or by compiling from source
- For Debian/Ubuntu systems: Use 'apt-get update && apt-get install freeswitch-all' or download .deb packages from freeswitch.org
- For RHEL/CentOS systems: Use 'yum install freeswitch' or download .rpm packages from freeswitch.org
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'freeswitch -version' and confirming it shows 1.10.10 or higher
- Restore configuration from backup if needed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40018 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40018 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data