CVE-2026-49840
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to version 1.11.1, esl_recv_event() parses Content-Length with atol() and passes the result straight to malloc(len + 1) with no sign or magnitude check. A malicious or man-in-the-middle ESL peer can send a frame with a negative Content-Length to corrupt the heap of, or crash, any process linked against libesl, before the client has authenticated to that peer. This issue has been patched in version 1.11.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn esl_recv_event(), the Content-Length header is parsed using atol() without any sign or magnitude validation, and the result is directly passed to malloc(len + 1). When a negative Content-Length is provided, malloc interprets it as a very large unsigned value, causing heap corruption or out-of-bounds memory access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine FreeSWITCH versionRun 'fs_cli -x "version"' or check the installed package version with your system package manager (dpkg -r freeswitch, rpm -qi freeswitch, etc.)Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 1.11.1 (e.g., 1.10.x, 1.8.x, or earlier)
-
Identify if ESL module is loadedRun 'fs_cli -x "module list"' and look for mod_event_socket or mod_esl, or check conf/autoload_configs/modules.conf.xml for the event_socket or esl moduleAffected if The ESL/Event Socket module is loaded and enabled in the configuration
-
Check ESL listener configurationExamine conf/autoload_configs/event_socket.conf.xml (or the equivalent ESL configuration file) and look for the <listeners> section binding to network interfacesAffected if An ESL listener is configured and bound to a reachable network interface (especially 0.0.0.0 or external IPs)
-
Verify ESL network exposureInspect the <bind> setting in the ESL configuration - check if it binds to all interfaces (0.0.0.0), external interfaces, or is limited to localhost (127.0.0.1)Affected if The ESL service is bound to 0.0.0.0 or any IP other than 127.0.0.1, making it reachable from other hosts
You are affected if your FreeSWITCH version is below 1.11.1 AND the ESL (Event Socket Layer) module is enabled and accessible to untrusted network peers who could send malicious Content-Length headers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.11.1
Upgrade FreeSWITCH to version 1.11.1 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to ESL peers using firewall rules or TLS encryption to prevent unauthenticated MITM attacks.
1.11.1
- 1. Identify all systems running FreeSWITCH versions prior to 1.11.1
- 2. Plan a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 3. Backup current FreeSWITCH configuration and any custom configurations
- 4. Upgrade FreeSWITCH to version 1.11.1 or later
- 5. Verify the installation was successful
- 6. Test ESL functionality to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
- 7. Monitor for any crashes or unexpected behavior related to ESL connections
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49840 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49840 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data