CVE-2026-49847
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to version 1.11.1, a single unauthenticated WebSocket frame containing a deeply nested JSON document crashes the FreeSWITCH process via stack overflow, terminating all calls and sessions on the host. The recursion drives the worker thread's stack pointer into the stack guard page, raising SIGSEGV from the kernel before any usable write primitive develops. This issue has been patched in version 1.11.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFreeSWITCH versions prior to 1.11.1 contain a stack overflow vulnerability in their WebSocket handling implementation. An unauthenticated attacker can send a single WebSocket frame containing a deeply nested JSON document, which triggers excessive recursion during parsing. This causes the worker thread's stack pointer to exceed the stack guard page, resulting in a SIGSEGV signal that terminates the FreeSWITCH process and all active calls/sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed FreeSWITCH versionRun 'freeswitch -version' or check the package version installed via your package manager (dpkg -r, rpm -qi, etc.)Affected if The version is lower than 1.11.1
-
Verify WebSocket module is loadedCheck FreeSWITCH configuration files (autoload_configs/modules.conf.xml) for 'mod_websockets' entry or run 'fs_cli -x "module list"' to see loaded modulesAffected if mod_websockets is loaded and enabled
-
Confirm WebSocket endpoint is configured and exposedInspect sip_profiles or the specific WebSocket configuration for any 'ws://' or 'wss://' listeners. Check for lines containing 'websocket' in the SIP profile XML files under /etc/freeswitch/sip_profiles/Affected if A WebSocket listener is configured and bound to an accessible IP/port
-
Check network exposure of WebSocket serviceReview firewall rules or network ACLs to determine if the WebSocket port (typically 8080 or 7443 for WSS) is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The WebSocket port is open to unauthenticated/untrusted network access
If your FreeSWITCH version is below 1.11.1 AND the WebSocket module is loaded and exposed to the network, you are affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.11.1
Upgrade FreeSWITCH to version 1.11.1 or later. As a temporary workaround, implement network-level filtering to restrict unauthenticated WebSocket connections or deploy a WAF capable of detecting and blocking abnormally nested JSON payloads.
FreeSWITCH 1.11.1
- Verify current FreeSWITCH version by running 'fs_cli -x "version"' or checking the process version
- Stop the FreeSWITCH service gracefully using 'systemctl stop freeswitch' or 'freeswitch -stop'
- Backup the current FreeSWITCH configuration directory (typically /etc/freeswitch) and any custom modules or scripts
- Update the package repository and install FreeSWITCH version 1.11.1 using the appropriate package manager (e.g., 'apt-get update && apt-get install freeswitch=1.11.1' or compile from source using the 1.11.1 tag from the official Git repository)
- Verify the upgrade by running 'fs_cli -x "version"' and confirming it shows 1.11.1
- Start the FreeSWITCH service using 'systemctl start freeswitch' or 'freeswitch'
- Test WebSocket functionality by establishing a test WebSocket connection and sending a non-malformed JSON message to confirm normal operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49847 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49847 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data