CVE-2023-40598
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.12, 9.0.6, and 9.1.1, an attacker can create an external lookup that calls a legacy internal function. The attacker can use this internal function to insert code into the Splunk platform installation directory. From there, a user can execute arbitrary code on the Splunk platform Instance.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn authenticated attacker with Splunk user access can create malicious external lookups that invoke legacy internal functions to inject arbitrary code into the Splunk installation directory, achieving remote code execution on the affected instance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.2.12>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.6>= 9.1.0, < 9.1.1< 9.0.2305.200CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Splunk Enterprise versionNavigate to Settings > About > Version or run: splunk versionAffected if Version is less than 8.2.12, or between 9.0.0-9.0.5, or between 9.1.0-9.1.0
-
Check Splunk Cloud Platform versionNavigate to Settings > Account Settings > Version Info in the Splunk Cloud interfaceAffected if Version is less than 9.0.2305.200
-
Verify user roles with external lookup permissionsNavigate to Settings > Users and Roles > Roles, then inspect each role for 'Lookup file' or 'External lookup' capabilities under the Objects sectionAffected if Users other than admins have roles granting external lookup creation or edit permissions
-
Inspect existing external lookup configurationsNavigate to Settings > Lookups > Lookup table files and examine any .csv files configured as external lookups. Check their source path and any associated scripts in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/lookups/ or custom appsAffected if External lookup files reference unknown or suspicious scripts, or point to writable directories outside the default Splunk installation
-
Check permissions on lookup directoryRun: ls -la $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/lookups/ and inspect file ownership and write permissionsAffected if Non-admin users have write access to lookup directories or lookup definition files
You are affected if your Splunk version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND untrusted users have the ability to create or modify external lookups.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.2.129.0.69.0.2305.200
Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to version 8.2.12, 9.0.6, 9.1.1 or later. Additionally, restrict external lookup creation permissions to prevent untrusted users from configuring external lookups.
Splunk Enterprise: 8.2.12, 9.0.6, or 9.1.1 | Splunk Cloud Platform: 9.0.2305.200
- Review Splunk upgrade documentation and ensure backup of configuration files (local/meta lookups, saved searches, etc.)
- Download the appropriate Splunk Enterprise fixed version (8.2.12, 9.0.6, or 9.1.1) from splunk.com
- For Splunk Enterprise on-premises: Stop the Splunk service, run the installer for the target version, then restart the Splunk service
- For Splunk Cloud Platform: Contact Splunk Support to schedule the upgrade to version 9.0.2305.200 or later
- After upgrade, verify external lookup configurations to ensure no malicious lookups were added
- Review Splunk audit logs for any suspicious activity related to external lookups
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40598 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40598 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data