Cognos ControllerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2023-40695

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Cognos Controller 10.4.1, 10.4.2, and 11.0.0 does not invalidate session after logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 264938.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Cognos Controller versions 10.4.1, 10.4.2, and 11.0.0 fails to invalidate user sessions upon logout, leaving active sessions accessible. This session fixation vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to potentially impersonate other users by reusing or continuing a session after the legitimate user logs out.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a version where session invalidation is properly implemented. Until patch is available, monitor session activity for anomalies and consider additional session timeout controls at the infrastructure level.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cognos ControllerApplication
Affected:= 10.4.1= 10.4.2= 11.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM Cognos Controller installed version
    Access the IBM Cognos Controller About page or check the installation directory for version information. Typically found in the product UI under Help > About or in the installation logs.
    Affected if The installed version is 10.4.1, 10.4.2, or 11.0.0 exactly.
  2. Confirm session remains active after logout
    Log in to IBM Cognos Controller with a test account, capture the session identifier or cookie, then log out. Attempt to use the original session identifier in a new request to access protected resources.
    Affected if The session is still valid and allows access after logout has been completed.
  3. Inspect session management configuration
    Examine the IBM Cognos Controller configuration files for session timeout and invalidation settings. Check web.xml or similar configuration files in the installation directory for session-config settings.
    Affected if Session timeout is set but no explicit session.invalidate() call is made upon logout action.
  4. Review session cookie behavior
    Use browser developer tools or a proxy to capture the session cookie during login, then after clicking logout, resend the original request with that same cookie to see if it is accepted.
    Affected if The server accepts and processes requests using the session cookie after the user has logged out.

You are affected if your IBM Cognos Controller version is exactly 10.4.1, 10.4.2, or 11.0.0 AND sessions can be reused after the logout action is performed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a version where session invalidation is properly implemented. Until patch is available, monitor session activity for anomalies and consider additional session timeout controls at the infrastructure level.

Fix this in Cognos Controller Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40695 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40695 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data