FortiosOperating system · Fortinet

CVE-2023-41841

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.2.4 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An improper authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.0.0 - 7.0.11 and 7.2.0 - 7.2.4 allows an attacker belonging to the prof-admin profile to perform elevated actions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

FortiOS 7.0.0-7.0.11 and 7.2.0-7.2.4 contains an improper authorization flaw where users with prof-admin profile can perform elevated actions beyond their intended privilege level. This represents a vertical privilege escalation within the FortiOS administrative interface.

MitigationUpgrade FortiOS to version 7.0.12 or later (for 7.0.x branch) or 7.2.5 or later (for 7.2.x branch). Prior to upgrading, assess current configurations and schedule maintenance window to minimize operational impact.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortiosOperating system
Affected:>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.11>= 7.2.0, <= 7.2.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check FortiOS version
    Run 'get system status' or 'fortios -v' via CLI or check in the web UI under Dashboard > Status
    Affected if Version is 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 or 7.2.0 through 7.2.4
  2. Identify prof-admin profiles in use
    Run 'get system accprofile' or 'show system accprofile' to list all administrative profiles
    Affected if Any prof-admin or custom accprofile with elevated privileges is configured for administrative users
  3. Review administrative user assignments
    Run 'get admin user' to see which users are assigned to prof-admin profiles
    Affected if Users are assigned to prof-admin profiles that could be exploited for vertical privilege escalation

A user is affected if FortiOS version falls within 7.0.0-7.0.11 or 7.2.0-7.2.4 AND prof-admin profiles are configured and assigned to users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.2.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade FortiOS to version 7.0.12 or later (for 7.0.x branch) or 7.2.5 or later (for 7.2.x branch). Prior to upgrading, assess current configurations and schedule maintenance window to minimize operational impact.

Recommended fix High confidence

FortiOS 7.0.12+ or 7.2.5+ (or latest 7.4.x stable release)

  1. 1. Identify the current FortiOS version by running: get system status
  2. 2. If running FortiOS 7.0.x (7.0.0-7.0.11), plan upgrade to version 7.0.12 or later
  3. 3. If running FortiOS 7.2.x (7.2.0-7.2.4), plan upgrade to version 7.2.5 or later
  4. 4. Review Fortinet release notes for the target version to confirm the security fix is included
  5. 5. Backup current FortiOS configuration before performing upgrade
  6. 6. Download the firmware image from Fortinet support portal
  7. 7. Upload and install the firmware through FortiOS GUI or CLI: execute upgrade firmware
  8. 8. After upgrade, verify the system is operational and the new version is running: get system status
Caveat Review release notes for potential configuration changes between versions; some firmware upgrades may require reconfiguration of certain features

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fortios Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,120
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41841 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41841 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data