CVE-2023-41844
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.2, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.1 all versions, FortiSandbox 3.0.4 and above allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests in capture traffic endpoint.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiSandbox contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in its capture traffic endpoint. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript or HTML via crafted HTTP requests that are later rendered without proper sanitization, allowing execution of unauthorized code in the context of other users' sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, <= 3.0.7>= 3.1.0, <= 3.1.5>= 3.2.0, <= 3.2.4>= 4.0.0, <= 4.0.4>= 4.2.0, <= 4.2.5= 4.4.0= 4.4.1= 4.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiSandbox installed versionLog into the FortiSandbox CLI and run 'get system status' or access the web GUI dashboard to view the firmware versionAffected if The displayed version falls within 3.0.0-3.0.7, 3.1.0-3.1.5, 3.2.0-3.2.4, 4.0.0-4.0.4, 4.2.0-4.2.5, or 4.4.0-4.4.2
-
Confirm capture traffic feature is in useCheck if the capture traffic functionality is enabled on the system via the web GUI under Network > Capture Traffic or via CLI command 'show system capture-traffic'Affected if The capture traffic feature is enabled and accessible to users or administrators
-
Review access logs for capture traffic endpointInspect HTTP access logs or web server logs for requests to the capture traffic endpoint, looking for unusual script tags or JavaScript payloads in the request parametersAffected if Suspicious patterns such as <script>, javascript:, or event handlers like onload/onerror appear in logged requests to the capture traffic endpoint
-
Examine captured traffic data for stored XSSIf you have access to the captured traffic storage or database, search for any stored entries containing HTML script tags or encoded JavaScript that were not sanitized before storageAffected if Any captured traffic records contain unsanitized HTML or script content that could execute in another user's session
A user is affected if their FortiSandbox version matches one of the affected ranges listed above AND the capture traffic feature is enabled, exposing the system to stored XSS injection via crafted HTTP requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch from Fortinet (addressed in FortiSandbox 4.4.3 and later versions) and implement input validation on the capture traffic endpoint to neutralize script payloads.
FortiSandbox 4.4.3 or later (or latest available version for your respective branch: 3.0.8+, 3.1.6+, 3.2.5+, 4.0.5+, 4.2.1+)
- 1. Identify the current FortiSandbox version by navigating to Dashboard > Status in the web UI or using 'get system status' in the CLI
- 2. Based on the affected version ranges, determine the minimum safe version: For 3.0.x branch use >=3.0.8, for 3.1.x use >=3.1.6, for 3.2.x use >=3.2.5, for 4.0.x use >=4.0.5, for 4.2.x use >=4.2.1, for 4.4.x use >=4.4.3
- 3. Download the appropriate firmware upgrade from Fortinet Customer Support Portal (https://support.fortinet.com)
- 4. Back up the FortiSandbox configuration via System > Maintenance > Backup & Restore
- 5. Upload and install the new firmware via System > Maintenance > Firmware
- 6. After upgrade, verify the system status and confirm the vulnerability is remediated
- 7. Alternatively, contact Fortinet PSIRT for official patch information if specific version guidance is required
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41844 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41844 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data