CVE-2023-41922
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA 'Cross-site Scripting' (XSS) vulnerability, characterized by improper input neutralization during web page generation, has been discovered. This vulnerability allows for Stored XSS attacks to occur. Multiple areas within the administration interface of the webserver lack adequate input validation, resulting in multiple instances of Stored XSS vulnerabilities.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored XSS vulnerability exists in multiple areas of the administration interface of a webserver due to improper input validation. User-supplied data is not properly neutralized before being rendered in web pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts that persist on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device model and firmware versionLog into the administration interface and navigate to System Settings or Device Info to view the model number and firmware versionAffected if The device is a Kiloview P1 or P2 with any firmware version
-
Confirm admin interface is accessibleAccess the web-based administration interface via the device IP address on the local networkAffected if The admin interface is reachable on the network
-
Check for stored XSS in admin input fieldsExamine the HTML source of admin pages (such as network settings, device name, or configuration fields) for any unexpected script tags, iframe tags, or JavaScript event handlers that may have been injected into stored valuesAffected if Malicious script tags or event handlers appear in the rendered HTML of admin pages from data that should have been sanitized
-
Review server responses for unsanitized outputSubmit test input containing characters like <script> or javascript: in admin form fields, then view the page source or inspect the response to see if characters are rendered as-is without encodingAffected if Special characters are rendered unescaped in the admin interface output
You are affected if you have a Kiloview P1 or P2 device with the admin interface accessible and unsanitized user input is rendered in web pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and output encoding across all input fields in the administration interface to neutralize malicious scripts before they are stored and rendered.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41922 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41922 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data