CVE-2023-42036
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKofax Power PDF PDF File Parsing Memory Corruption Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Kofax Power PDF. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a memory corruption condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-21582.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a memory corruption vulnerability in Kofax Power PDF's PDF file parsing engine. The flaw results from inadequate validation of user-supplied data during PDF parsing, leading to out-of-bounds memory access. Successful exploitation requires a user to open a specially crafted malicious PDF file, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.0.0.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Power PDF is installedOpen Windows Settings > Apps & Features, or use PowerShell: Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select-Object DisplayName | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like '*Power PDF*'}Affected if Power PDF appears in the installed programs list
-
Find the installed version numberIn Apps & Features, click on Power PDF and view the Version field, or use PowerShell: (Get-ItemProperty 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\*' | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like '*Power PDF*'}).DisplayVersionAffected if A version number is returned (note the exact version for the next check)
-
Compare your version to the affected rangeTake the version number found in the previous step and compare it numerically to 5.0.0.12 - check each component (5 vs 5, 0 vs 0, 0 vs 0, 12 vs 12)Affected if Any component is lower than the corresponding component in 5.0.0.12 (e.g., 5.0.0.11, 4.9.1.0, or any version starting with 4.x)
-
Verify PDF processing capability is in useCheck if users on this system have the ability to open PDF files with Power PDF, or review application logs for PDF parsing activityAffected if PDF files can be opened or processed by Power PDF on this system
If Power PDF is installed and its version is below 5.0.0.12, the system is vulnerable when users open PDF files - apply vendor patch immediately.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.0.0.12
Apply the vendor-supplied patch from Kofax when available. Until then, enforce strict policies against opening PDF files from untrusted sources and consider deploying endpoint detection solutions capable of analyzing PDF attachments.
Kofax Power PDF version 5.0.0.12 or later
- 1. Verify current Power PDF installation version by opening the application and navigating to Help > About, or checking Add/Remove Programs
- 2. If version is below 5.0.0.12, download the latest version of Kofax Power PDF from the official vendor website or your organization's software distribution point
- 3. Close all instances of Power PDF and any related processes
- 4. Run the installer with appropriate administrative privileges
- 5. Follow the on-screen installation prompts to complete the upgrade
- 6. After installation, verify the new version is 5.0.0.12 or later by checking Help > About
- 7. Test that PDF files open correctly and basic functionality works as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-42036 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-42036 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data