CVE-2023-42916
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 17.1.2 and iPadOS 17.1.2, macOS Sonoma 14.1.2, Safari 17.1.2. Processing web content may disclose sensitive information. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited against versions of iOS before iOS 16.7.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability in WebKit (Apple's browser engine) allows processing of malicious web content to disclose sensitive information. The issue was addressed with improved input validation. This is a memory safety vulnerability that could allow attackers to read memory contents beyond buffer boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 17.1.2= 38= 39= 11.0= 12.0< 15.8.1>= 16.0, < 16.7.3>= 17.0, < 17.1.2< 15.8.1>= 16.0, < 16.7.3>= 17.0, < 17.1.2>= 14.0, < 14.1.2< 2.42.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Safari version on macOSOpen Safari, go to Safari menu > About Safari. Compare the version number to 17.1.2.Affected if The installed Safari version is lower than 17.1.2 and macOS is 14.0 or later.
-
Check Safari version on iOS/iPadOSOpen Settings app, go to General > About > Software Version. Compare the version number to the affected iOS/iPadOS ranges.Affected if iOS or iPadOS version is less than 15.8.1, or between 16.0 and 16.7.3, or between 17.0 and 17.1.2.
-
Check macOS version if Safari cannot be checked directlyOpen System Settings > About > macOS Version. Compare to the affected range.Affected if macOS version is 14.0, 14.1, or 14.1.1 (anything >= 14.0 and < 14.1.2).
-
Check WebKitGTK+ version on FedoraRun command: rpm -q webkit2gtk4.0 or dnf list installed webkit2gtk4.0. Compare version to 2.42.3.Affected if WebKitGTK+ version is lower than 2.42.3 on Fedora 38 or 39.
-
Check WebKitGTK+ version on DebianRun command: dpkg -l libwebkit2gtk-4.1-0 or apt show libwebkit2gtk-4.0-7 2>/dev/null. Compare version to 2.42.3.Affected if WebKitGTK+ version is lower than 2.42.3 on Debian 11.0 or 12.0.
You are affected if your browser uses a WebKit engine version lower than 17.1.2 (Safari/macOS/iOS/iPadOS) or lower than 2.42.3 (WebKitGTK+ on Linux), and you process untrusted web content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.42.314.1.215.8.1
Apply the vendor-supplied security updates (iOS 17.1.2, iPadOS 17.1.2, macOS Sonoma 14.1.2, or Safari 17.1.2). For systems unable to update, mitigate by restricting web browsing to trusted sources and disabling JavaScript where possible.
Apple: macOS 14.1.2 (Sonoma), iOS 17.1.2, iPadOS 17.1.2, Safari 17.1.2 | WebKitGTK+: 2.42.3
- For macOS: Upgrade to macOS Sonoma 14.1.2 or later via System Settings > Software Update
- For iOS/iPadOS: Upgrade to iOS/iPadOS 17.1.2 or later via Settings > General > Software Update (or iOS 16.7.3 for older devices)
- For Safari: Upgrade to Safari 17.1.2 or later (included with macOS 14.1.2)
- For WebKitGTK+: Upgrade to version 2.42.3 or later via your distribution's package manager
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,048.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-42916 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- seclists.org
- www.openwall.com
- security.gentoo.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- www.debian.org
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-42916 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data