CVE-2023-43485
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen TACACS+ audit forwarding is configured on BIG-IP or BIG-IQ system, sharedsecret is logged in plaintext in the audit log. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWhen TACACS+ audit forwarding is configured on F5 BIG-IP or BIG-IQ systems, the TACACS+ shared secret credentials are being written in plaintext to the audit logs, allowing anyone with log access to obtain the sensitive authentication secret.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.2.0.1.0.13.97-eng>= 8.3.0, < 8.3.0.0.12.118-eng>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.5>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.9>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if TACACS+ audit forwarding is configuredRun 'tmsh list /sys audit' or check the BIG-IP GUI under System > Logs > Audit. Look for any tacacs or forwarding configuration entries.Affected if TACACS+ audit forwarding is enabled and configured on the system
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP or BIG-IQ versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' on BIG-IP, or check System > Overview > Software Version in BIG-IQ Centralized Management GUI.Affected if The version falls within any of the listed vulnerable ranges (BIG-IQ: >=8.0.0 to <8.2.0.1.0.13.97-eng or >=8.3.0 to <8.3.0.0.12.118-eng; BIG-IP modules: 13.1.0-13.1.5, 14.1.0-14.1.5, 15.1.0-15.1.8, 16.1.0-16.1.3)
-
Examine audit logs for plaintext TACACS+ shared secretsSearch /var/log/audit or the configured audit log destination for patterns matching the shared secret value. Look for log entries containing the literal secret string used for TACACS+ authentication.Affected if Log entries contain plaintext TACACS+ shared secret credentials
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable BIG-IP or BIG-IQ version AND has TACACS+ audit forwarding configured, resulting in plaintext secrets appearing in audit logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.2.0.1.0.13.97-eng8.3.0.0.12.118-eng15.1.9
Upgrade to a patched version of BIG-IP or BIG-IQ that does not log the shared secret in plaintext, and rotate any exposed TACACS+ shared secrets immediately. Review log access controls to limit exposure.
BIG-IP: 15.1.9+ or 16.1.4+ (depending on branch); BIG-IQ: 8.2.0.1.0.13.97-eng or 8.3.0.0.12.118-eng
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP or BIG-IQ version by checking System > Software Management > Images (or using 'tmsh show sys version' command)
- 2. Determine the appropriate target version based on your current major version branch
- 3. For BIG-IP 13.1.x: Upgrade to version 13.1.5 or later (note: versions up to and including 13.1.5 are affected, so verify specific fixed build)
- 4. For BIG-IP 14.1.x: Upgrade to version 14.1.5 or later
- 5. For BIG-IP 15.1.x: Upgrade to version 15.1.9 or later
- 6. For BIG-IP 16.1.x: Upgrade to version 16.1.4 or later
- 7. For BIG-IQ 8.0.x-8.2.x: Upgrade to version 8.2.0.1.0.13.97-eng or later
- 8. For BIG-IQ 8.3.x: Upgrade to version 8.3.0.0.12.118-eng or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-43485 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-43485 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data