CVE-2023-44301
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell DM5500 5.14.0.0 and prior contain a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability. A network attacker with low privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of malicious HTML or JavaScript code in a victim user's web browser in the context of the vulnerable web application. Exploitation may lead to information disclosure, session theft, or client-side request forgery.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDell DM5500 versions 5.14.0.0 and prior contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An authenticated low-privilege network attacker can inject malicious HTML or JavaScript code through a vulnerable parameter that gets reflected back to victim users' browsers without proper sanitization, enabling session theft, information disclosure, or client-side request forgery.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.14.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the DM5500 firmware versionAccess the Dell PowerProtect Data Manager administrative interface and navigate to the System or About section to view the installed firmware version. Alternatively, use the CLI command 'show version' or check the firmware upgrade history if available.Affected if The installed firmware version is 5.14.0.0 or any version prior to 5.14.0.0 (for example, 5.13.x, 5.12.x, etc.)
-
Confirm web management interface is enabledVerify that the Dell DM5500 web-based management interface is accessible and operational. This is typically accessible via HTTPS on port 443 or a custom management port.Affected if The web management interface is enabled and accessible to network attackers
-
Identify accessible user accountsCheck if low-privilege user accounts exist on the system. Review the user management section to confirm the presence of non-administrator accounts that have access to the web interface.Affected if Authenticated low-privilege network users can access the vulnerable endpoint
-
Test for reflected input without encodingIf you have access to a test environment, log in with a low-privilege account and identify web parameters that accept user input. Submit a benign test payload containing HTML or script tags and observe if the input is reflected back in the response without proper encoding or sanitization.Affected if User-supplied input is reflected in responses without HTML encoding or output sanitization
Your environment is affected if the installed Dell PowerProtect Data Manager DM5500 firmware version is 5.14.0.0 or earlier AND the web management interface is accessible to authenticated low-privilege users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patch for Dell DM5500; if no patch available, implement input validation, output encoding, and Content Security Policy (CSP) headers on the affected endpoint to neutralize the XSS vector.
Latest available Powerprotect Data Manager DM5500 firmware version greater than 5.14.0.0 (contact Dell support for specific version)
- 1. Navigate to the Dell PowerProtect Data Manager support site at www.dell.com/support
- 2. Locate the DM5500 product and check for available firmware/security updates newer than version 5.14.0.0
- 3. Download the latest available firmware update that addresses security vulnerabilities
- 4. Review the update release notes to confirm it includes a fix for CVE-2023-44301 (Reflected Cross-Site Scripting)
- 5. Follow Dell's standard firmware upgrade procedure for the DM5500 appliance, ensuring to back up current configuration
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is running and validate that the XSS vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-44301 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-44301 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data