CVE-2023-44407
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DAP-1325 SetAPLanSettings Gateway Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DAP-1325 routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XML data provided to the HNAP1 SOAP endpoint. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-18826.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in D-Link DAP-1325 routers in the HNAP1 SOAP endpoint's XML data handling. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied data length before copying to a fixed-length stack buffer, enabling remote code execution as root without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.09b03CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is D-Link DAP-1325Access the router web interface (typically at 192.168.0.1) and check the device model in the status or management page, or run 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' via SSH/Telnet if availableAffected if Device is not a D-Link DAP-1325 model
-
Check firmware versionIn the router web interface, navigate to Status or Management section to view the firmware version; alternatively, via command line run 'cat /etc/fw_info' or check the web interface source for version stringsAffected if Firmware version is less than 1.09b03 (e.g., 1.08, 1.07, etc.)
-
Verify HNAP1 SOAP endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access the HNAP1 endpoint via HTTP request to the router (typically at /HNAP1/ or /HNAP1/Login.aspx) using a tool like curl: curl -X POST http://<router-ip>/HNAP1/Affected if HNAP1 endpoint responds (indicates SOAP service is running)
-
Confirm XML handling is enabledSend a basic HNAP1 SOAP request with XML payload to the endpoint and observe if it processes the request. The vulnerability is triggered when XML data is processed without proper length validationAffected if The device accepts and processes HNAP1 SOAP requests (no authentication required per CVE details)
If the device is a D-Link DAP-1325 running firmware version below 1.09b03 and the HNAP1 SOAP endpoint is accessible, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.09b03
Since no authentication is required and the device likely has vendor support ended, immediately restrict network access to the device or replace it if no firmware update is available; implement network segmentation as a compensating control.
D-Link DAP-1325 firmware version 1.09b03 or later
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the D-Link DAP-1325 device by accessing the router's web interface or checking the device label
- 2. Navigate to the D-Link support page for the DAP-1325 at support.dlink.com or via the product page at https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin
- 3. Locate and download firmware version 1.09b03 or later from the official D-Link support site
- 4. Access the DAP-1325 administration web interface (typically at 192.168.0.1 or 192.168.1.1)
- 5. Navigate to the Management > System > Firmware Upgrade section
- 6. Upload the downloaded firmware file and allow the device to complete the update process
- 7. After reboot, verify the firmware version has been updated to 1.09b03 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-44407 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-44407 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data