Mbed TlsApplication · Trustedfirmware

CVE-2023-45199

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Mbed TLS 3.2.x through 3.4.x before 3.5 has a Buffer Overflow that can lead to remote Code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Mbed TLS versions 3.2.x through 3.4.x contain a buffer overflow vulnerability that can be exploited to achieve remote code execution. The vulnerability was addressed in version 3.5.

MitigationUpgrade Mbed TLS to version 3.5 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mbed TlsApplication
Affected:>= 3.2.0, < 3.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Mbed TLS library version
    Check the version of the Mbed TLS library installed in your system. This can typically be found via: 1) pkg-config --modversion mbedtls or mbedcrypto, 2) checking library file metadata with `ls -la` or `file` on libmbedtls.so or libmbedcrypto.so files, 3) reviewing build artifacts or dependency manifests that list the Mbed TLS version, 4) checking version headers if you have access to source code (such as include/mbedtls/version.h)
    Affected if The installed version is 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.3.0, 3.3.1, 3.4.0, or any 3.4.x version prior to 3.5.0
  2. Check for Mbed TLS in application dependencies
    Examine your application's dependency list, package lock files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, Cargo.lock, etc.), or software bill of materials (SBOM) to determine if Mbed TLS or its variants (trustedfirmware-mbedtls, mbedtls, libmbedtls) are listed as a dependency and note the version
    Affected if Mbed TLS is listed as a direct or transitive dependency with a version in the 3.2.x to 3.4.x range
  3. Locate Mbed TLS shared libraries
    Search for Mbed TLS library files on the system using: `find / -name 'libmbed*' -type f 2>/dev/null` or check common library paths such as /usr/lib/, /usr/local/lib/, /opt/, or application-specific lib directories. Use `strings` or `readelf` on found libraries to extract version strings if not clearly named
    Affected if Mbed TLS libraries are found and their version falls within the affected range (3.2.0 to less than 3.5.0)

You are affected if any Mbed TLS library in your environment is version 3.2.0 or later but earlier than 3.5.0.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.5.0 or later
Fixed in 3.5.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Mbed TLS to version 3.5 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.5.0 or later

  1. Verify current Mbed TLS version by checking library files or build configuration
  2. Download Mbed TLS 3.5.0 or later from the official repository (https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls)
  3. Replace existing Mbed TLS installation files with the new version
  4. Rebuild any applications that link against the Mbed TLS library
  5. Verify the upgrade by confirming the new version number in the library
  6. Test that cryptographic operations function correctly with the updated library
Caveat Review release notes for any API changes between 3.2.x/3.4.x and 3.5.0; update application code if incompatible changes affect your implementation

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mbed Tls Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45199 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data