AppbuilderApplication · Opentext

CVE-2023-4553

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-01-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 23.2 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in OpenText AppBuilder on Windows, Linux allows Probe System Files. AppBuilder configuration files are viewable by unauthenticated users. This issue affects AppBuilder: from 21.2 before 23.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenText AppBuilder contains an improper input validation vulnerability that allows unauthenticated users to access and view configuration files on Windows and Linux systems. This occurs due to insufficient validation of user input that enables path traversal or direct file access to system configuration files.

MitigationUpgrade AppBuilder to version 23.2 or later to receive the patch. Additionally, verify that authentication is properly enforced on all configuration file access paths and consider network-level access controls to limit exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AppbuilderApplication
Affected:>= 21.2, < 23.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm OpenText AppBuilder installation
    Locate AppBuilder installation directory or check for AppBuilder services running on the system (common paths include /opt/appbuilder or C:\Program Files\AppBuilder on Linux/Windows respectively). Use 'ps aux | grep appbuilder' on Linux or check Windows Services for 'AppBuilder' service.
    Affected if AppBuilder software is found installed on the system
  2. Check installed AppBuilder version
    Access the AppBuilder administration interface or check version files in the installation directory. The version is typically visible in the web UI footer, in a VERSION file, or via admin command 'appbuilder --version' if available.
    Affected if Version is >= 21.2 and < 23.2 (versions 21.2 through 22.x are vulnerable)
  3. Verify web interface accessibility
    Attempt to access the AppBuilder web interface without authentication. Check if the configuration file access endpoints (typically /config, /configuration, or similar paths) are reachable over the network.
    Affected if AppBuilder web interface is accessible without login credentials
  4. Test for path traversal vulnerability
    Send HTTP requests to the AppBuilder web endpoints with traversal sequences such as '../../../../../../etc/passwd' or '..\..\..\windows\system32\config\sam' to see if configuration files can be retrieved.
    Affected if Path traversal sequences return system configuration files or sensitive data
  5. Check authentication enforcement on config paths
    Review AppBuilder configuration files (web.xml, application.properties, or similar) to determine if authentication is required for configuration file access endpoints.
    Affected if Configuration endpoints do not require authentication or authentication is disabled

A system is affected if OpenText AppBuilder version 21.2 through 22.x is installed AND the web interface or configuration access paths are accessible without authentication, allowing path traversal to retrieve system files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 23.2 or later
Fixed in 23.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade AppBuilder to version 23.2 or later to receive the patch. Additionally, verify that authentication is properly enforced on all configuration file access paths and consider network-level access controls to limit exposure.

Recommended fix High confidence

23.2 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of OpenText AppBuilder
  2. 2. Plan and schedule an upgrade window to version 23.2 or later
  3. 3. Create a complete backup of the current AppBuilder configuration and data
  4. 4. Upgrade AppBuilder to version 23.2 or the latest stable release available from OpenText
  5. 5. After upgrade, verify that the improper input validation is fixed by testing that system files cannot be probed and configuration files are no longer accessible to unauthenticated users

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Appbuilder Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-4553 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-4553 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data