CVE-2023-48784
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability [CWE-134] in FortiOS version 7.4.1 and below, version 7.2.7 and below, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions command line interface may allow a local privileged attacker with super-admin profile and CLI access to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA format string vulnerability (CWE-134) in FortiOS CLI versions 7.4.1 and below, 7.2.7 and below, 7.0 all versions, and 6.4 all versions allows a local privileged attacker with super-admin profile and CLI access to execute arbitrary code or commands via specially crafted format string inputs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.0.16>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.8>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine FortiOS versionRun the CLI command 'get system status' and locate the 'Version' field in the outputAffected if The displayed version falls within 6.4.0 to 7.0.15, 7.2.0 to 7.2.7, or 7.4.0 to 7.4.1 (all 7.0.x versions are affected)
-
Identify super-admin profilesRun 'get system admin' and review the 'profile' field for each admin user. Look for entries showing 'super-admin' or a profile with full administrative privilegesAffected if Any admin account exists with a super-admin profile or equivalent full-privilege profile
-
Verify CLI access is enabledCheck console and administrative access settings via 'get system console' and 'get system interface | grep -f admin' or review admin access configurations in the web UI under System > AdministratorsAffected if CLI access (console, SSH, or Telnet) is permitted for the super-admin accounts identified in step 2
-
Confirm affected service is runningRun 'diagnose sys service list' or check active services listening on administrative ports (22 for SSH, 443 for HTTPS GUI)Affected if Administrative services accepting CLI or GUI connections are exposed and reachable
The environment is affected if FortiOS version is in the vulnerable ranges AND at least one super-admin profile exists with CLI access enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.167.2.87.4.2
Upgrade FortiOS to version 7.4.2 or above, 7.2.8 or above, or later patched versions. Additionally, enforce least-privilege by limiting super-admin profiles and restricting CLI access to only trusted administrators.
7.0.16 or later (7.0.x), 7.2.8 or later (7.2.x), or 7.4.2 or later (7.4.x) - recommend upgrading to latest 7.4.x branch for longest support
- 1. Identify the current FortiOS version running on the device using 'get system status' command in CLI or via FortiManager/FortiCloud.
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version: for 6.4.x upgrade to 7.0.16 or later; for 7.0.x upgrade to 7.0.16 or later; for 7.2.x upgrade to 7.2.8 or later; for 7.4.0-7.4.1 upgrade to 7.4.2 or later.
- 3. Review Fortinet release notes for the target version to check for breaking changes, especially for configuration compatibility and feature behavior.
- 4. Back up the current FortiOS configuration using 'execute backup full-config' command.
- 5. Download the firmware image from Fortinet support portal (fortinet.com/support) matching the target fixed version.
- 6. Upload and install the firmware via CLI ('execute firmware upgrade') or through the web UI under System > Firmware.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the system is operational using 'get system status' and confirm the version reflects the fixed release.
- 8. Verify the fix by confirming the version is >= 7.0.16, >= 7.2.8, or >= 7.4.2 depending on the branch.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-48784 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-48784 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data