CVE-2023-50178
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiADC 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.1 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions and 6.0 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and various remote servers such as private SDN connectors and FortiToken Cloud.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiADC contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability (CWE-295) that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to perform Man-in-the-Middle attacks on communications between the device and remote servers such as private SDN connectors and FortiToken Cloud. The vulnerability stems from the appliance failing to properly validate SSL/TLS certificates when establishing connections to these external services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.4>= 6.1.0, <= 6.1.6>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.6>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.2>= 7.1.0, <= 7.2.3= 7.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed FortiADC versionRun the command 'get system status' or 'diagnose sys version' in the FortiADC CLI to retrieve the firmware versionAffected if The version displayed falls within these ranges: 6.0.0 to 6.0.4, 6.1.0 to 6.1.6, 6.2.0 to 6.2.6, 7.0.0 to 7.0.2, 7.1.0 to 7.2.3, or exactly 7.4.0
-
Identify SDN connector configurationsReview the FortiADC configuration for any SDN connector settings, typically found under 'System' > 'SDN Connector' or by running 'get system sdn-connector' in CLIAffected if An SDN connector is configured and the FortiADC version is in the affected list, as the device will attempt SSL/TLS connections without proper certificate validation
-
Identify FortiToken Cloud configurationCheck for FortiToken Cloud integration settings, typically under 'User' > 'FortiToken Cloud' or by running 'get fortitoken-cloud-setting' in CLIAffected if FortiToken Cloud is enabled and the FortiADC version is in the affected list, as certificate validation is not performed when communicating with FortiToken Cloud service
A system is affected if the FortiADC version is any of the listed affected versions AND the device is configured to connect to external services such as SDN connectors or FortiToken Cloud.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade FortiADC to a patched version as specified in Fortinet's security advisory. For interim mitigation, ensure all communication with sensitive services occurs over networks with strong access controls to reduce MITM exposure.
Upgrade to FortiADC 6.0.5+, 6.1.7+, 6.2.7+, 7.0.3+, or 7.4.1+ (latest stable release in your respective branch)
- 1. Identify the current FortiADC version by running: get system status or diag sys version
- 2. Based on the affected version range, plan upgrade path: For 6.x versions upgrade to 6.0.5+, 6.1.7+, 6.2.7+ respectively; for 7.0.x upgrade to 7.0.3+; for 7.1.x and 7.2.0-7.2.3 upgrade to the latest available patch in those branches; for 7.4.0 upgrade to 7.4.1 or later
- 3. Download the appropriate firmware upgrade from Fortinet customer support portal or FortiGuard: https://www.fortinet.com/support/terms
- 4. Before upgrading, backup the current configuration using: execute backup config tftp <config-name> <tftp-server-ip>
- 5. Upload the new firmware image via Web UI (System > Firmware > Upload) or CLI: execute restore image tftp <file-name> <tftp-server-ip>
- 6. Reboot the device to apply the new firmware: execute reboot
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is installed: get system status
- 8. Confirm the certificate validation vulnerability is resolved by testing connections to affected services (private SDN connectors, FortiToken Cloud)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50178 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50178 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data